thurstylark

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

It's not about actually caring about making minors safer on their platform, or caring about giving tools to guardians to help keep minors safer on their platform.

It is about having something to point to the next time Meta is called in front of a congressional subcommittee to discuss proposed regulations. Look, we did positive things to our platform in the name of protecting minors, and we did it voluntarily, despite what losses we saw in that demographic! We definitely can (and so totally do) put the control of those protections in the hands of parents, where it belongs! We don't need to be regulated, because we're doing it ourselves already!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I think it would be naive to think that they don't know this already. Not to say that I think you're making that argument, but that I think the losses are calculated against the benefit of the appearance of care that this move affords them. Sure, these new restrictions and tooling means that some parents will be more willing to allow their teens to engage with the platform, but there's no way that will outweigh the active user reduction in the targeted age range.

The real benefit is looking like they're doing stuff in a positive direction in the context of minors. I'm definitely expecting them to point at this move (and its voluntary nature) as an argument against future regulation proposals. Especially the part where they're ostensibly putting that control in parents' hands.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can even find radioactive shit sold on Amazon as health products. So radioactive, that it can incur the wrath of federal agencies.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Oh, poor baby can't make money with an illegal business model. How awful.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

On top of this, your account gets penalized if you refuse to take an offered ride.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The complexity is the point. The less people willing or able to jump through all the necessary hoops to receive their healthcare through the system, the less money they have to pay out. Adding more complexity in the form of yet another opaque approval system adds many more hoops to get through, which is actually the entire purpose of that system. Deloitte knew this going in.

Yes, I have sympathy for the individuals who have to build this system, however I have absolutely zero sympathy for the company that put it into practice.

Yes, the medicare system is needlessly complex, however Deloitte decided to replace manpower with cheaper automation which had the side effect of saving them work by increasing rejections.

The world also happens to be complex. Enough so that both things can be true.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 weeks ago

As a former rideshare driver: Fuckin' based.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

-... . .- - / -- . / -


/ .. -

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago

It's like a little sibling. I'll shit talk my own culture all day, but you make fun of it, then fuck you from here to next Wednesday.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago

My city recently renamed a street after Nelson Hackett, who was a local slave, but more notably, was the first and only escaped slave to have made it to Canada, and then be extradited back to the US. The road was previously named after Archibald Yell, the governor of Arkansas at the time, who wrote the extradition order. Canadian laws at the time forced the government to respect the extradition, but they found this situation so distasteful that they immediately changed the law to basically make Canada a safe haven for escaped slaves.

Lots of locals didn't know who Archibald Yell was, but now they do, and the road is now named after the slave whose case laid the groundwork for the Underground Railroad because of the governor's actions.

Not just a correction to the person who should really be celebrated, but also an S-tier snub, if you ask me.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I remember having to watch those for onboarding. They weren't as cheesy as they could have been for an informational video.

I do appreciate how they're handling it, though. A public post-mortem is much more reassuring than damage control PR. Plus, being honest means they gain the IT folks who actually have to use their stuff as allies.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

My guess: Because they reviewed and signed the kernel space code which calls code that is unreviewed and unsigned (or, at the very least, pulls directly from files that are unreviewed and unsigned without proper validation or error checking), calling out CrowdStrike's failure puts them on the hook too.

view more: next ›