Yeah, seems weird, but there's also points where it's not related at all.
One is a company using user data they didn't tell they would use for this purpose, and illegally trying to do it anyway. They literally sell the data by making a product of it. It's also a private company with stakeholders.
Other is EU scanning messages, but not selling them.
So it's about who you trust basically.
Might be a 10thDentist take, but I could be surprised.
It's reliable in specific use cases, I'll give it that.
I didn't say that, but it might explain why Apple didn't say much. I'm just keeping the discussion to the thread.
No, but that doesn't make it good.
The whole world except a minority moved away from SMS a long time ago.
He should do both. The message getting to as many people as possible is more important that he posting on Twitter.
Sometimes CEOs just get paranoid. You can either flip a switch an remove an app, or risk getting personally targeted by Russia.
Russia won't get to you, most likely, but it's the paranoia that gets you.
It does, because now it's their own thing.
So instead of having what everyone else is having, they have their own and also hijack theirs, because Apple put the company name in it.
It's the whole point. They'll try to take over the AI brand by doing this.
"So what does AI actually stand for? "
"It stands for Apple Intelligence, of course!"
"Wow, Apple really is everywhere, they are so good and competent."
This will happen too often.
At least they move in the right direction.
Pretty sure the Apple fee system was deemed illegal, no?
5 people could do it though.