again, easy to say, hard to do.
what does that actually look like moment to moment? what do people do differently between those that do and those that don't succeed in this? how can you teach something you don't know because no one taught you?
what does an empathy lesson look like?
it's a hard problem and we really do need to figure out some specifics if we want to make any real progress.
ok ok ok, i have a theory on where her head was at.
i think it might have been about current messaging around "stop teaching girls is their job to avoid being sexually assaulted and start teaching boys that it's not ok to do".
I think in all honestly part of the reason we ended up in this paradigm is because parents generally try to teach what they know. for the most part, in the past men weren't really aware of how common rape was, or didn't care. men probably didn't see it as a thing to talk to their girls about. it was also something they likely had no relevant experience in teaching about. so men didn't see it a important to teach anything about it to girls. and it didn't seem likely to negatively affect their son... women on the other hand clearly saw the need to prepare young girls for this reality. so they teach what they know. what little that can do from their perspective with their power. moms default to imparting the defense mechanisms they have built to survive in this terrible state of affairs.
so, my thought is that this is a mother trying to teach her son not to be a predator. but she doesn't even know what predators think to make them do that. she has no idea what to say that might make her son not do something that she doesn't understand and doesn't know if her son has or ever will feel those things. it's a hard problem. it's easy to say that we need to put the onus on men to not be predators, but how do we turn that into reality without sounding like this? what does a parent actually say to a young boy that will carry more weight than "don't do that".
what do you mean pairing? what kind of os do you plan to put on the mini pc? the biggest hurdle is going to be hdcp compliance with any legal streaming service. something like kodi on the other hand, just works like any other pc? a mini pc is just that. a mini pc. there's nearly infinite method to connect streaming services to a pc. I have a Plex server, but it doesn't play nice with all content, so honestly, i usually just use my network storage and pull things straight from the file browser. load them into media player classic with madvr.
I know there's newer systems that do fancier things, but I'm content. I need to upgrade my nas to be better able to transcode x265 video streams. that's s big drawback on Plex for me. my biggest use case is watching things virtually with friends. it's how i watch movies with people. my server can current encode a single x265 video stream pretty well, but the second it has more than one client it chugs. forget it if 4 people want a 4k movie. I would need a crazy beefy rig to run that. it also won't convert hdr without paying. most of my friends aren't trying to watch on an hdr screen.
so, we're back to me streaming via discord screenshare. it's not the best, but at least i don't need to keep a separate 4k hdr copy of movie for myself and a 1080p x264 copy for Plex that way. mad vr will even handle the hdr conversion for me when I stream.
it works well enough, though I'm open to suggestions as well. it needs to be easy for the clients to use. it can be hard for me, that's fine, but jellyfin is too much for most of my friends and family. Plex is already pushing it.
there just isn't the money in that kind of product anymore. studio porn in general isn't doing great. especially among younger viewers.
I worked for hustler broadcast for a bit, so i can confidently say that you're not wrong. we would still occasionally air some of those older more serious movies, but basically anything since 2000 has been more on the goofy side. that said, there are some genuinely funny ones out there. they aren't very good as porn, but they were my favorites. like there was one where Trump and Kim jong un captured Hilary Clinton in North Korea and they all had sex. the trump and the Kim were terrible, but the Hilary genuinely kind of looked the part, if Hillary Clinton had massive fake boobs. there was an Obama one from 2008 that was incredibly racist. it basically had Obama coming into the White House and revealing that he was actually a big bad gangster rapper, or whatever, here to fuck all your white bitches. I think there were three of those.
honestly, there's some high concept only fans out there if you're willing to pay. I know of one couple that does a legit travel blog with travel sex interludes. you might also find enjoyment in erotic literature if you haven't given that much of a shot. the Internet stuff of very different from the published stuff, maybe give them both a shot?
all of this kind of comes together to really get in the way of high concept studio porn. women with intelligence, self respect, talent, or real ambition don't go into studio porn. it's the toxic old way to get into porn. anyone that might have been good enough to actually perform well in those movies either goes for softcore stuff that they can claim isn't porn, or will self start on onlyfans. honestly, i bet we'll start to see more of that kind of content come out of the new porn media world. these days we're seeing more and more collectives and small companies operate through onlyfans. for better and worse. an optimistic take from someone that has worked on the back end of that industry for you is that these companies might be perfect for that. especially the ones that operate more like streamer houses. where it's just a co-op of creators and maybe a little suuport staff or a manager. that's the kind of situation i think we'll start seeing low budget high concept porn with better production than it used to have because it's easier to be better for cheaper these days.
this is America, half this country gets a boner when they think about shooting someone and being praised for it. all cops started this way and so they don't feel bad when the enable vigilante justice in others. they all think that shit's cool as hell anyway
i currently have one of the few municipal Internet plans in the United States.
best Internet I've ever had. gigabit symmetric fiber for a flat $60/mo. no fees, no outages, no data caps.
during the one outage i experienced in the three years I've had them i was quickly able to find multiple places to see status updates about the hardware issue they had and it was fixed in under an hour.
they also have a 2.5 gig and a 10 gig option for reasonable prices. I don't think many other companies even offer anything above 1 gig outside of business packages.
it will be difficult for me to move anywhere else. with the work that i do this has been life-changing. come to Longmont Colorado, we have good Internet, amazing mountain sunsets, and lots of tacos.
i love my government Internet. it's one of the biggest things keeping me here.
yeah funny enough, this is more of a recent thing. it's still spreading at the moment. isps over here just kind of got it in their head that they could make extra money with this one day.
most forums had bump rules. any new comment jumped a post back to the top, like 4chan.
but then there's no sorting to it all and it functions on bumps like 4chan. not necessarily a better system.
the real reason is that 90% of users on any social media site only lurk. the users that post tend to post a lot. these are just natural things that work out that way due to human nature. confidence and extroversion are some of the last things to make it to niche social media.
obviously a news show isn't going to feel the same rewatching it. that's not the point lol.
that would be like saying it's dumb to preserve newspapers in libraries because it's not going to feel as good rereading the "Hitler is dead" headline. people don't look at old news to have a good time.
boy was it silly of us to preserve that kind of thing and it totally never comes in handy/s
that's not even what people are upset about anyway. comedy Central mostly makes entertainment programming that isn't news based and can still be enjoyed whenever. believe it or not, comedy Central has a lot of content that will stand the test of time. especially when looking at their stand-up catalogue.
this is the destruction of a library. a digital one, but a library none the less. that's what people are mad about.
but you're right. we should just dump all of our old movies and shows. they're worthless moldy junk anyway... 🙄
ooh yeah, a good tooltip on mouseover would be perfect.
there is quite a bit of granularity to the options these days if you haven't tried it in a bit. I was able to make it work more or less exactly how i wanted.
really? they're almost as common as cigarette butts once were now. are you a hermit?