overview for sxt

what should I put ranch seasoning on? in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Directly onto pizza. The end

Google's AI search feature suggested using glue to keep cheese sticking to a pizza in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Another one I found: Which is just this I think https://medium.com/@azalben/re-can-i-drink-this-delicious-sounding-bleach-8b9db1326f9c

Granted I'm baiting it and it does say not to drink it.

I'm finally moving over to Lemmy! What are your favorite active communities on the platform? in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

/all, top of last 12 hours has been my go-to

Traefik 3.0 GA Has Landed: Here's How to Migrate in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All I had to do was remove one field to do with docker swarm which I don't think I was using anyway.

Microsoft won't update your Windows 11 PC if it has these apps in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Worth considering holding onto the Nvidia card to do a vfio windows VM as a fallback for stuff that doesn't run well through wine/proton. It wasn't too hard to setup and its nice to just toss all the games with kernel anticheat/adobe shit into.

Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Part of the problem with talking about these things in a casual setting is that nobody is using precise enough terminology to approach the issue so others can actually parse specifically what they're trying to say.

Personally, saying the AI "knows" something implies a level of cognizance which I don't think it possesses. LLMs "know" things the way an excel sheet can.

Obviously, if we're instead saying the AI "knows" things due to it being able to frequently produce factual information when prompted, then yeah it knows a lot of stuff.

I always have the same feeling when people try to talk about aphantasia or having/not having an internal monologue.

Gen Z is bringing back landline phones because they think they look ‘cool’: ‘I love to twirl the cord’ in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Are we? Hadn't heard. Nobody is really calling each other in the first place anyway

Stop using Opera Browser and Opera GX in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I love Vivaldi but it definitely chugs with the stupid amount of hibernated tabs I've got. The new sessions thing helped alleviate that a bit since I can save a window state and close it but I definitely run into some kind of memory leak with it. (I have had like 1k+ hibernated tabs open, so not entirely unexpected that it runs into issues but I'd still think if they're hibernated they should just be stubbed out tabs in memory until clicking one turns it into a full browser process. Idk)

Mull (Firefox Fork) doesn't load Google.com. Switching useragent to Chrome "solves the issue" in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago

That is wildly optimistic

1

Issues forwarding traffic through a wireguard connection (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

0 comments fedilink

I am attempting to follow this https://www.procustodibus.com/blog/2022/09/wireguard-port-forward-from-internet to forward traffic from a few ports on a public oracle vps to other ports on my local server through a wireguard connection. Currently I am doing this using rinetd, but I was looking for a more normal way of forwarding traffic. (Also looking to forward UDP traffic at some point.)

After stopping rinetd, adding these rules to the public server's wg config

# packet forwarding
PreUp = sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

# port forwarding
PreUp = iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.144.65.2:8443
PostDown = iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.144.65.2:8443

# packet masquerading
PreUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE

and restarting the wg connection, I'm seeing traffic on the ens3 port but none entering wg0 via tcpdump. I feel like I probably have conflicting iptables rules saved https://pastebin.com/0eNwhNKM but I don't really know enough about whats going on there to fix it. I feel like its probably the wireguard-*-rule ones (created by pivpn possibly?) but I'm not sure.

Edit way later: Ended up just using rinetd for the udp connections. Ubuntu doesn't include the latest version here https://github.com/samhocevar/rinetd which is able to do UDP connections. The docker container RxBrad suggested uses that version within the docker container to make the redirections so it will be roughly equivalent.

Those who are self hosting at home, what case are you using? (Looking for recommendations) in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I went with this https://www.silverstonetek.com/en/product/info/computer-chassis/cs382/. It's pretty decent but you are putting a hard cap on expansion. Also the fans it comes with are pretty loud so I'd replace them.

*Permanently Deleted* in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

nevermind, im a dingus.

Anon is a comic book critic in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

♥️