I don't know that I'd call those "pants" any more than I'd call a fishnet top a "shirt", or a padlocked collar a "necklace". They're kinda more BDSM accessories to me, but if you'd wear that stuff to lunch at Applebee's, then perhaps. To Walmart obviously, but not Applebee's!
stoicmaverick
You don't traditionally wear pants while doing BDSM.
That's what I'd do, but it seemed too obvious.
Doing the sex?
I could eat bechamel with a spoon like it was yogurt. How do you make it garlic?
What's in a vegan shake? Never even considered it for a vegan conversion.
Username checks out.
That was obviously the extreme example of the concept taken to its limit, I was hoping you would follow me on the whole length of the walk. How about the example of starting false rumors and such about them? How about the fact that what you're talking about is illegal in and of itself? Playing dirty is immensely gratifying, and satisfying on a visceral level; I'm not trying to pretend that it isn't. I don't like it either, but it is their legal right to have that. The whole reason we don't like them is that they lack the moral restraint that usually develops sometime around middle school, and the importance of which I'm trying to instill. I could write a whole book based around the thesis that the primary difference between the two ideologies, is the importance that one places on delayed gratification, but I'm typing on my phone right now....
War would be a lot easier if we chose to do away with pesky restrictions like the Geneva convention, but would you be proud to be on the side that dropped white phosphorus on an elementary school to win? Would you prefer that we start making up lies and false rumors about Trump and Co? Restraint is difficult; I understand that, put the resulting clean victory is the most lasting kind.
What did you do?
Just because you're a supernatural personification of pain and punishment and Nicolas Cage doesn't mean you have to neglect your skin. Treat yourself.