stingpie

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not a model for good programing. I don't program professionally, I just like challenging myself in my hobby projects.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

No, I don't do anything professionally. I just enjoy challenging myself.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I am both the left guy and right guy. If you can't program without using a memory safe language, it's a skill issue. But I also don't want to switch to rust because I like the challenge of manual memory management. (Also rust's syntax and semantics looks like it was designed by a monkey attacking a typewriter.)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You can't choose where you grow up. :(

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Countercounterpoint: Emulation is not as cool as the real thing. Especially for the PSP because it was basically a tiny DVD player.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Rust is already obsolete, compared to Stingpie's excellent assembly language, paired with object oriented programming!

This is the SEALPOOP specification:

  1. an assembler must create a binary program which satisfies the programmer's specifications.
  2. a compiler must translate the programmer's code into SEALPOOP's parallel instruction set source, which should be fed into the SEALPOOP PISS assembler.
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I don't think the Chinese room is a good analogy for this. The Chinese room has a conscious person at the center. A better analogy might be a book with a phrase-to-number conversion table, a couple number-to-number conversion tables, and finally a number-to-word conversion table. That would probably capture transformer's rigid and unthinking associations better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, you're thinking of the first scene of the movie where a fly falls into the teletype machine and causes it to type 'tuttle' instead of 'buttle'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Ok. I'm getting tired. You bested me this round. Have a nice day.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You say it's the goal of the proletariat to protect the revolution, but why would they? Each proletariat would benefit from the revolution's failure- they could live better lives as the bourgeois. You talk about the proletariat like they are some monolithic entity, with a single mind and goal. You talk big about helping the individual, but cannot see beyond their class. The proletariat is a person, with needs, desires and opinions. What father would hold the abstract ideals of the "revolution" over the life of his sick daughter? Any father I know would do anything for the safety of his children, even hoard life-saving medicine from others.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Communist logix

we need to abolish private property so everybody has equal power.

we class of people to maintain public ownership

After all, how can we enforce public ownership without a more powerful class of enforcers?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure fused add multiply with store is part of the AVX instruction set.

view more: next ›