skillissuer

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

how low we're talking

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

xubuntu is fine if your box is a potato or if you're coming from windows vista

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i'm here to remind you that for last 20ish years half of the time chemistry nobel goes to biologists, and now they doubled down on ai wankery with giving it to alphafold

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because these end up generating most of electricity. older plants matter less specifically because these are less efficient - operating them means more fuel costs per MWh. normally, you can see new flashy plants generating all the time it's practical, because these are more efficient, have less maintenance downtime etc and when demand grows, progressively less efficient units start generating coming from spinning reserve. the two exceptions are NPPs which are best operated at constant high power because of their neutron physics and renewables that are literal free energy so everything they do is taken in. the only place where you can improve efficiency of NPPs is in turbine, and that probably is pretty well optimized unless turbine is very old, because increasing steam temperature would mean changed conditions in reactor in way that could happen to be out of spec. we have figured out wind power pretty well, and perovskites aren't a thing, and won't be a thing until they become more durable, which they won't. in all cases, upgrades would have to make sense both economically and/or in emission costs. this includes CHP and laying municipal heating grids, and good luck with that with how dysfunctional american local govts are (where probably biggest emission gains from CHP could be made)

you can redo this for other types of thermal powerplants and come to the same conclusion. if you say that saltman&co and his assemblage of lying machines can outsmart thousands of turbine engineers, you might be a shill for making other people believe that or a moron for believing that yourself

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

all these private jets

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

CCGTs have efficiencies in the range of 60%-ish percent. bringing it up to 85% would mean that now these run almost at carnot efficiency taking adiabatic flame temperature of methane burning in air as upper and practical temperatures of heatsink (60C) as lower. this is not happening, because other cycles with lower efficiencies are used in practice

if you want to improve efficiency of power generation, just replace old junk with new kit, or better yet, build nuclear and renewables where efficiency matters less when considering emissions. you know what, damn i do think that lying box burning enough electricity to power a small country (like macedonia) could come up with this

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

not gonna happen, this would break thermodynamics. he made that up on the spot, he's full of shit and he knows it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you are part of the problem

[–] [email protected] 111 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Nobody should trust LLMs with anything

ftfy

also any inputs are probably scrapped and used for training, and none of these people get GDPR

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

oh no, it would be so sad if all these libertarian assholes lost their livelihood in form of money laundering nerd tokens

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 months ago

don't you know, it's hate speech against corporate profits

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

this is not how conspiracy theories work. these start and end with need for feeling special for "having" some secret knowledge. it's all elaborated nicely if you have an hour of unnecessary time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTfhYyTuT44

view more: ‹ prev next ›