Sounds like it.
silence7
joined 1 year ago
At some point, that car won't be cost-effective to repair, and you'll want to replace it. Be a lot better to have strong privacy legislation in place when that happens.
More that peoples' movement data isn't worth much, so it wouldn't be a big deal to impose legal requirements on keeping it private.
This is timely in light of JD Vance's comments about wanting to surveil the body of every woman in America. I just dropped a new investigation into car companies selling off your private location data to shady data brokers. The case for federal privacy legislation has never been stronger.
per the article, it's rather better than that.
Pretty much anything trying to predict human behavior is a heuristic; people using them as if they've got some kind of certainty is a problem.
My impression from the article is more that they're not doing any kind of garbage-in assessment: nobody is making sure they're getting answers about the right person (eg: some women date more than one guy) and some women don't feel safe giving accurate answers to the police, and there aren't good failsafes available for when it's wrong; you're forced to hire legal counsel and pursue a change via the courts.
Not in the same detailed minute-by-minute tracking of where you've been.
They're also buying tracking data from phone apps, so you'd need to make sure you're not running any of those either.
It's a gift link, so you shouldn't hit the paywall unless you've disabled javascript or are using a browser extension which strips off URL parameters
The value is that it shows people who aren't using EVs yet what's available
Depends on how close they can be made in watt-hours per kilo. They might be good enough for vehicles once the technology comes into reasonably widespread use, while avoiding a lot of the issues with trying to acquire sufficient lithium.