ruination

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Also, I'm pretty sure the argument is more about the unequal enforcement of the law. Copyright should be either enforced fairly or not at all. If AI is allowed to scrape content and regurgitate it, piracy should also be legal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's one thing, but I think regurgitating it and claiming it as your own is a completely different thing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

My general approach to this tends to be to identify what makes me happy in life, splurge on those, save on everything else. For example, I love computers, so I'd splurge on parts, but religiously meal prep to save on food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't make sense too, like it's bad enough even if just one died.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd imagine if, say Signal, refuses to comply and gets banned from the EU, one could always use a VPN. I think that nothing short of either a full global ban or implementing a version of The Great Wall of China would allow these ridiculous laws to be enforced. Even then, there will always be ways around it for those willing to go the extra mile.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Honestly, they could at least wait and see what happens in the UK before proposing something similar. They literally have a free guinea pig next door.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's such a shame though, since as far as I know, the EU have had such an amazing track record. I'd expect no less from big tech, but not the EU.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I wish people who proposes laws and regulations that violates human rights with provable intent to do just that would be fined or imprisoned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are adblockers even illegal? I didn't think it was.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Don't forget about malvertising, that's probably a more imminent danger. If Google and other ad companies don't give enough of a shit about user to actually filter out malware ads, why should I give enough of a shit about their revenue to not use uBO?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, that's understandable. My native tongue doesn't really have gendered pronouns so they/them feels right at home for me (though ironically, the people in my country are mostly conservative and bigoted and wouldn't accept nonbinary)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I keep it simple and default to they/them unless they mention some specific preference. Doesn't matter if they appear to be very traditionally masculine or feminine, or anything in between.

view more: next ›