Can you expand the “much worse circumstances” a bit?
redballooon
joined 1 year ago
That's a tad easier said than done.
And we also have plenty of nationalist parties on the rise trying to avoid that.
- Ex coworker
- Seemingly Great roi.
That smells like a pyramid scheme from miles away.
Your local slaughterhouse. Of, if that doesn't exist, your regional slaughterhouse.
Quite the contrary. I had a good feeling about the principal of my sons new school, and he was part of the reason why we went for the school.
He didn't last another year there. First he was not seen for months, and now we know that he was convicted for possession of child porn.
Until then I generally had a feeling that I could assess people quite well. Now, that feeling is shattered.
So the ideal solution would be a 2-state+1-cage solution, where the cage is for Hamas and Netanyahu together with his Ultra Orthodox faction, where they can fight each other to death, while Israel and Palestine negotiate on a peace treaty.
To my knowledge the closest state to the 2 state solution was an offer to Arafat after the Camp David negotiations. He didn't take the offer, but I don't know why. But that was in 2000, before Hamas seized power in 2005. That was why I asked.
Palestine would currently be a country, for the first time in human history, if Hamas did not exist.
Can you expand on this?
Ugh. That link is horrible. I mean the descriptions behind it.
It looks like non-Hamas Palestinians have two enemies working against them.
Makes me wonder what exactly a Pro-Palestinian position is.
Redditors, mostly
What is hummus?