rcbrk

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's always crickets when the issue of improper poor ranking of XMPP is addressed in these threads..

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yep. Really need to compare the best-practice XMPP clients (e.g. Conversations, Siskin), not half-developed clients more suited to the XMPP landscape of 20 years ago. -- Just as Matrix's ranking in the table is high because only the state-of-the-art clients are considered -- there are plenty of Matrix clients which don't support e2ee, for example.

This list of mistakes isn't exhaustive, but extending from poVoq's mentions, here are some things XMPP(conversations) does actually have positive findings for:

  • End to end encrypted by default [OMEMO]
  • End to end encryption is available [OMEMO]
  • Voice/video calls are end to end encrypted ["calls are always end-to-end encrypted with DTLS-SRTP"]
  • Utilizes Perfect Forward Secrecy [OMEMO]
  • Data is encrypted in transit [TLS and OMEMO]
  • You can verify contacts out of band [https://gultsch.de/trust.html]
  • There has been a third party code audit [2016]
  • Provider can scan for illegal content [If you send content unencrypted, otherwise no different to Matrix/Signal]

I'm not sure there's much differentiation between any apps when it comes to "What can the apps hand to police?"; if the police have physical access to your device and app, they have access to everything you do on that device/app.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 10 months ago (12 children)

"South Africa, which is functioning as the legal arm of the Hamas terrorist organization [...]"

-- https://twitter.com/LiorHaiat/status/1745427037039280207 (https://archive.md/L7AwX)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Something from here, if you want an Android device: https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Pope-on-a-float

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So.. I really don't know chemistry, and these aren't the highest quality references, but here goes:

  • 4 mol of iron in a heat pack provides 1648.4 kJ of heat. ^[1]^
  • 4 mol of iron weighs 223g. ^[2]^
  • Recycling 1000kg of steel saves 642 kWh of energy. ^[3]^
    • Recycling 0.223kg steel saves 642 * 0.223 / 1000 = ~ 0.143 kWh
    • 0.143 * 3600 = 515 kJ

Huh. So maybe heat packs are a reasonable use of scrap iron's embodied energy after all. Assuming you have a sufficient source of uncontaminated steel filing waste and that it's economical to collect and process into heat packs.

...But only if you're heating your water using fossil fuels using an inefficient method! If your water is heated using solar or waste heat capture or a heat pump^[4]^, which would swing the balance way over to hot water bottles again.

  1. https://brainly.com/question/16900421
  2. https://www.convertunits.com/from/moles+Iron/to/grams
  3. https://lbre.stanford.edu/pssistanford-recycling/frequently-asked-questions/frequently-asked-questions-benefits-recycling
  4. https://www.eec.org.au/for-energy-users/technologies-2/heat-pumps
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're not considering the energy required to smelt the iron.

Iron filings (in a collected quantity high enough to make manufacturing these heat packs worthwhile) are not a waste product, they are recycled -- saving the smelting of that much new iron.

Sawdust+iron heat packs are a very useful and non-hazardous product, for sure, but aside from situations where a hot water bottle is impractical, hot water bottle still wins.

view more: ‹ prev next ›