raptir

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LibreWolf for example removes the telemetry but is ultimately still updating to each new Firefox version. In the event of Mozilla going under, some project would need to pick up the maintenance of the actual browser core that the "forks" are pulling updates from.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Aren't they realistically more "patches" than forks? They continue to track the Firefox codebase as it updates.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, telling me I can switch from Linux to MacOS is not exactly a solution.

That said, Apple took money from Google to make Google the default on Safari. While I don't think Apple will crumble without Google's money, $18 billion certainly more than funds the development of Safari.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can argue that it shouldn't be true, but the fact that this is presented as breaking news about Google is ridiculous. This is true about many positions in the US.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I hope not. Not only do I not want to see Google annihilate Firefox but I also don't want to see the further "appification" of every website. It's ridiculous that I need to install an app to pay for parking when I'm visiting a city and will only use the app once. It's not even Bluetooth enabled so it's not like it can be used offline if you don't have a connection.

The fact that Firefox is open source gives me some hope that the community could take the reins and continue development if Mozilla did run into financial trouble.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (15 children)

My problem with this whole thing is that Chrome's only real competition (meaning it's not based on Chromium) is funded nearly entirely by Google paying to be the default search engine. If you aren't going to allow search engines to pay to be the default then Mozilla needs to find a completely different way to make money.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What a strange boogeyman here. I have a 15 year old HP that was $400 when I bought it and the hinges are still fine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yes, it's ridiculous to say that if self driving cars kill fewer people than human driven cars but still more than zero that we should not use them. That's like saying "why use seatbelts, they're not 100% effective."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

That's equally ridiculous to say. Self driving cars just need to be better than people to be worth it, they just currently are not better than people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Around 1 per 100 million miles.

view more: ‹ prev next ›