queermunist

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fewer witnesses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I have never seen this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make that squat DEEP

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

You don't work with people, not really. You manage them. Your job is to strategically use them for maximum productivity; workers might be allowed some small amount of input but only as long as it can be fit within your "roadmap strategy". Your job it to discipline the workers and keep them on task. And, of course, make sure they never unionize.

These problems are structural. I don't care what your motivations are, your class position is as an underling enforcer for the boss and you're bourgeoisified by your position within the class structure. A manager, within this specific class structure, has every incentive to be an enemy of the workers. An individual manager can choose to become a class traitor, and people in management can be extremely powerful union organizers! But it rarely happens because it requires they betray their own class interests. It's structural.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm not opposed to hierarchical organizational structures?

Under capitalism, the job of every single manager is to extract as much surplus value from the workers as possible. That's their actual economic function. The problem isn't the organizational model, the problem is the larger economic system they exist within.

If you had some kind of horizontal non-hierarchical collective under capitalism all that could do is turn everyone inside of it into petite-managers and force them to exploit themselves in order to hit productivity quotas. Or, more likely, it would fail because people don't want to do that shit to themselves and need to be used and abused by a manager to make capitalism function.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

There's a few countries with huge hydroelectric resources, which are not applicable to most of the world. Other countries have merely seen a peak and slight decline, and based on trends it will take decades for that decline to reach the levels we need tomorrow. Demand for compute from the AI tech bubble has basically destroyed all the progress we've made since the pandemic.

The problem is too much consumption. Rich nations gobble up as much as they can and poorer nations are used as their mining pits and factories to feed the endless appetite for more, and as long as this continues the world is going to continue warming.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This will not save us, we're still set to burn way too much fossil fuel even with fast EV/solar/electrification.

We. Need. To. Consume. Less.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago

I have some sympathy for people who have completely internalized the logic of capitalism and don't even realize the role they play in our own oppression, but that sympathy only goes so far. After a certain point all I have left is contempt. They're bourgeoisified by their position within the labor force, in my view it doesn't matter what their intent is. In reality, many of them are just doing their jobs and they aren't ruthless climber psychopaths. The problem is that their jobs are inherently tied into a broader system of capitalist oppression.

view more: ‹ prev next ›