queermunist

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Experience is ongoing learning through the subjective self. When you experience the color red you do not just record it with your photoreceptors, and your experience of the color red is different from mine because we don't just record wavelengths of light. We don't just continue to learn from continual exposure to new data, we also continue to learn from generating our own data. In this way our subjective experience is qualitative, not simply quantitative. I don't just see the specific light wavelengths, I experience the "redness" of red.

When LLM is trained on that kind of data it just starts to hallucinate. This is promising! I think the hallucination phenomenon is actually a precursor to creativity and gives us great insights into the nature of subjective experience. In a sense, my phenomenal experience of the color red is actually much like a hallucination where I am also able to experience the color's "warmth" and "boldness". Subjectivity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

Good job tearing down that strawman! 🙄

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)

The human imagination also involves the phenomenal experience. You do not just record the data coming at you and regurgitate it, you experience it and then your experience further changes the data itself. We call this "subjectivity" and it's where creativity comes from.

I am not saying that machine creativity is impossible. What I'm saying is these LLMs are not creative because they don't even know what they're doing and they don't even know "they" are doing it. There's no "there" there. No more creative than rolling dice.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

I would never call an actual technician a techbro! Techbros are Rick&Morty ledditor "fuck yeah science!" dorks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm excited for how these tools will be used by human creators to accomplish things they could never do alone, and in that aspect it is a revolutionary technology. I hate that their marketing calls it "AI" though, the only intelligence involved is the human user that creates prompts and curates results.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (22 children)

I'm sorry, anyone who says these so-called "AI" are capable of creativity are being hoodwinked by marketing. This is an algorithmic probability engine, it doesn't think and it doesn't have an imagination. It just regurgitates probabilistic responses from its large data set.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (104 children)

There can be nothing new or original out of AI because all of its inputs are stolen from what already exists. Real creativity comes solely from humans. Also, that clip - the song, singing, and visual - is dreadful in every way.

This needs to be hammered into techbro's heads until they shut the fuck up about the so-called "AI" revolution.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Anyone who has had discontinuation syndrome knows the experience of "brain zaps" - basically feels like an electric shock toy going off inside your head somewhere behind your eyes/sinuses. Is it anything like that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›