postnataldrip

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bet you they will make them work in inhospitable conditions and forget they exist until they don't meet an unrealistic performance target.

No wait, sorry. I was thinking of their human workers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

It's just virtualised Deliverance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

As I understand it these are basically an insurance policy. The promoter takes out a policy detailing the odds of a payout being required, and pay a premium based on the insurer's risk assessment.

And of course the insurer wants to minimise the odds of paying out, and the promoter wants to minimise their premium - so the top prize is usually, as above, near-unwinnable.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yup, this is on form for them. This isn't the first product they've done it to and surely won't be the last.

The moment the news broke we started migration planning, a short while later their new pricing came through and immediately justified the project spend. Tens of thousands of VMs migrated, a ton of labour, and even some hardware refreshes thrown in - and still cheaper than renewing, by a looong shot.

Shame, I liked VMware.

[–] [email protected] 209 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ah yes, KeepAss

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Was about 3pm here /cries in Australian

We regularly get screwed over during business hours by things being pushed out overnight in the US/UK

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

If you mean signed by your CA then this is me too, albeit with an intermediate CA in the middle (honestly pointless in my case, but old habits etc).

I don't host anything externally and trusting the CA certs internally is easy as Ionly need to do it on a handful of devices. This + reverse proxy keeps things tidy and uncomplicated.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Yup, had to read it twice! Just about had a heart attack

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yup and that is the same issue with elections. Candidate A wants to ban private jets and burn tyres, candidate B wants to legalise child labour. A wins then claims they have a mandate to burn tyres

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

and among advertising, programming, and security professionals that fraction is more like two-thirds to three-quarters

Leopards, face etc

[–] [email protected] 116 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (14 children)

the pairing restriction would "undermine the security, safety, and privacy of Oregonians by forcing device manufacturers to allow the use of parts of unknown origin in consumer devices."

If only there were options that would encourage the use of safe, genuine parts.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Good call. Being crashed into with a 16km/s closing speed probably would be a hindrance.

view more: next ›