philomory

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Wow, a Lain meme was not something I was expecting.

I should watch that show again sometime, I still have the DVDs somewhere I think.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m always keen to shit on Google, but, this is about “having search terms in the query string” and “having links that take you directly to the thing you clicked on without any redirect dance to obfuscate the Referer header”. With all the other shit to legitimately complain about from Google, this seems so silly to focus on. Google isn’t even the one that sent the Referer header, that would be your browser (which, Chrome didn’t exist yet at the time). RFC1945, from 1996, for HTTP 1.0, even explicitly stated that any application that communicates over HTTP (i.e. a web browser) should offer the user a configuration option to disable sending Referer headers.

Edit: slight clarification, Chrome did exist during part of the time period that the lawsuit covers, though it only started to pick up serious market share towards the end of the relevant time period.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jethro Tull’s Thick as a Brick at 44 minutes, or their A Passion Play at 45 (each was an entire vinyl album on both sides for a single song, though some CD/mp3 re-releases later split them into multiple chunks for easier navigation).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That’s not quite right though, there’s the factor you know (password to your vault), and the factor you have (a copy of the encrypted vault).

Admittedly, I don’t use that feature either, but, it’s not as bad as it seems at first glance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Tampopo is pretty great, and, I feel, pretty obscure as well.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Man, I’d never read “Stop talking to each other and start buying things” before, that’s a hell of an article.