nicetriangle

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah for sure. Mostly indirectly. I know a few people in my line of work who lost jobs because the client decided to just use AI to generate something.

I've also seen a number of examples of publications using AI images for editorial pieces which absolutely used to be paying jobs. For example this Atlantic article on Alex Jones. An actual person would have been paid to do a piece like this before AI came around.

And also there was the San Francisco ballet that did a bunch of their Nutcracker promo campaign art with AI stuff last year. They had traditionally used artists and photographers for years to do key pieces for their promo materials.

And as far as I am personally concerned, I've seen a marked slump in the volume of work inquiries I've been getting in the last year. I've been fortunate enough to remain fully booked and in the past just had to turn down a lot of work, but right now I'm getting about half as many inbound inquiries as I would have even a year ago. Hard to pin that on any one thing but I am sure AI is a factor. I'd be lying if I said that there haven't been a number of my jobs over the years that couldn't have been done with one of these AI models and a little trial and error.

I've also had a few clients now send me Midjourney stuff and basically want me to replicate it but make it work for whatever thing it was they were needing artwork for. So right there, that's all the fun problem solving and artistic exploration out the window and it's basically a case of "fix the robot's thing." It's pretty depressing.

I'd be mostly fine with the robots doing away with all of our jobs if it meant we were heading into some post-work utopia where we got to just spend time doing the things that really matter to us, but that's almost definitely not where this is going. All the windfalls will go to the top, the jobs will be less interesting, and wages will be depressed.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

Yeah that's pretty consistent with my expectations. A lot of work will transition into fixing the robots mistakes. So we'd be ceding the interesting, more creatively challenging aspects of our jobs to AIs and turning into data janitors. And that would only last as long as we'd be necessary. They'd hammer out the details making that janitor work eventually disappear.

I do design and illustration and it'd kind of be like telling me "Well we don't need you to illustrate this stuff anymore, but Midjourney still draws shitty hands with too many fingers. So your job now is to fix those hands." That is not what I came here to do and that does not provide the fulfillment I seek from a line of work. And following that analogy, Midjourney will eventually make flawless hands and I'd be out of a job.

Fortunately right now AI cannot hit a specific design/illustration brief to the consistent standards my projects require, nor iterate on a project based on specific and vague client feedback. So I still have work for now, but I see the writing on the wall. I'm always surprised other people don't see that writing too.

This whole thing is going to make an insane chasm of the wealth equality divide we already have.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Learn to have a discussion with people without being a dickhead about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah I just found this out and sure enough it works.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (25 children)

Just need to start doing away with fuel subsidies

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yep all those countless hours of travel, gallons of gas, car repairs, transit fares, etc we’ve been covering out of pocket our whole working lives has been a free subsidy to commercial real estate companies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah it was crazy what went wrong in this thing in the space of a few years before we got rid of it... Just off the top of my head:

  • Pulled too close to one of those parking dividers and the bumper barely scuffed up onto it. All the plastic attachment clips in the front bumper snapped and the bumper sagged a couple inches from there out. They quoted me something like $500 to replace some plastic clips.
  • Fuel injectors sprayed gas onto the engine block causing smoke to come out from under the hood
  • Recall on the turn signals
  • Fabric in the roof of the car bubbled up and sagged down
  • Labels on the center console (radio/climate control/etc) started peeling off
  • Lid of the center console broke
  • Glove compartment door broke
  • Stereo broke
  • Cupholders broke
  • Driver side door speaker went

There was some other stuff too but it's been a while now. My last car was an Accord that I had for many years and that thing was rock solid. I still miss it but had to sell it when I moved out of the country.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I really liked how the car drove but after owning a 2001 Jetta I'd probably never buy another VW. That car had the worst quality control of any car I've ever seen. It was insane how much stuff broke in that car. I'll stick with Japanese cars if I was in the market for one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

No it's not necessary. I've been a Kindle user for close to a decade and never bothered.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Spotify announced stock buybacks in 2021 that were greater in total that they most likely will pay artists in that same timeframe. Doing so artificially depresses the the amount of their revenue that's counted as profit, which is what they use to calculate artist royalties.

https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/20/spotify-to-spend-1b-buying-its-own-stock/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Nah the savings are probably being mostly passed on to stock buybacks and executive salaries

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

From what I understand that 70% they're paying artists is from "profit."

And from another comment in this thread:

Their last quarterly financial statements shows $65 million profit on $3.36 billion in revenue.

And then you have stuff like this:

https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/20/spotify-to-spend-1b-buying-its-own-stock/

So lets assume they make $65 million in profit every quarter between when that article came out and April 21 2026 (the period the article states they were doing buybacks). I count 18 quarters in that period. So if my math is correct that is $1.17 billion in "profit" in the same period of time they plan to do $1 billion in stock buybacks. But artists are only getting 70% of said profits. So that's about $819 million to artists in the same period of time Spotify is doing $1 billion in stock buybacks.

So we have a mega corporation playing creative accounting and doing stock buybacks instead of paying artists more. Classic.

view more: ‹ prev next ›