netchami

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

There's Revolt and Matrix, both are open source and can be self hosted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

TIL that XMPP is defined in an RFC. You're correct, I wasn't aware of that. I really don't understand why the IETF take such a decision though. I don't know why these guys are defining high-level protocols for things like messaging at all.

But back to your earlier points:

For example you can't have end-to-end encryption if you use a non-standard protocol

This doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Matrix has E2EE while using a "non-standard" protocol. So does Signal, in fact, it created the strongest E2EE protocol out there.

VC startups like Matrix only increase fragmentation of the ecosystem

Every new project that is created increases fragmentation. So does Revolt, Discord, Skype, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, etc. These all use "non-standard" protocols.

Also, the author of RFC 6120 is a Cisco employee, how is a multinational corporation better than a VC-funded startup? XMPP is an open standard, just like the Matrix protocol. It doesn't matter who created it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't make any sense

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Nah, they have a clause in their EULA which allows this, it's ridiculous. Piracy is the only solution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Who defines standard internet protocols and how is XMPP one of them??? "Standard internet protocols" are DNS, HTTP, TLS, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (6 children)

VCs suck, but Matrix is open source, everyone can self-host their own server, write their own client or even fork the entire protocol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

It isn't proprietary either

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (16 children)

What part of Matrix is proprietary? It's not an app, instead, it's an open protocol that can be used by anyone to build a messaging app or host a server.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Is this a serious question?

This is the exact same ridiculous argument that proprietary software corporations make. It never made any sense, security through obscurity will never work. Linux is open-source used on ~80% of all web servers, in your logic these servers would all be vulnerable. It just doesn't make any sense. Linux is also used in many embedded devices and Android is based on the Linux kernel. But Android (which is also entirely open source) has one of the best security models out there.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8489908

How big tech generated billions in fines... then didn't pay them::Rarely a month goes by without big tech companies getting fined for price fixing, squashing competitors or misusing data, but it can take years before they pay a penny.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8489908

How big tech generated billions in fines... then didn't pay them::Rarely a month goes by without big tech companies getting fined for price fixing, squashing competitors or misusing data, but it can take years before they pay a penny.

view more: next ›