Given that AI images and media can't be copyrighted, does the nominal "subject" have any recourse?
mwguy
joined 1 year ago
The same thing that prevents you from putting in a piece of shit knockoff part that puts others at risk while you're driving?
You're desire to not die.
Over 500 years old.
The first weapons that would be visibly identified as rifles are about 500 years old.
It's not theft if there's no criminal intent. If the lack of scanning was caused by equipment malfunction then there's no reason to think that they intended to steal.
Morally maybe, but legally no. Theft requires criminal intent. If the person is honestly attempting to pay for the goods and errors in the payment method cause an over or underpayment, that's not theft.
We hang cattle rustlers round here.....
Of course. Sometimes it doesn't work. Often times it's an honest mistake that a cashier themselves may have made. And now WalMart is treating you, a paying customer like a criminal.
Just because they accidentally made ransomware doesn't make it not ransomware.
A more accurate term would be that they ransom the functionality of the product they sold until you pay the ransom.
When the economy starts to falter an unemployment rises, people attend job fairs at higher numbers. More at 10.
In the US a photoshopped nude would be copyrightable. But courts here have said that AI generated content doesn't get the benefits of copyright.