mojo_raisin

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The job of CEO seems the far easier to replace with AI. A fairly basic algorithm with weighted goals and parameters (chosen by the board) + LLM + character avatar would probably perform better than most CEOs. Leave out the LLM if you want it to spout nonsense like this Amazon Cloud CEO.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump is incredibly dangerous. For that reason I would rather fight him with methods that work,

Because non-violence has been so effective at stopping fascism historically?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

I'm not saying it was a smart thing for the shooter to do, or that I'm celebrating this event or what it could've been, I'm just saying that it's perfectly normal and understandable for an oppressed peoples to not have sympathy for the misfortune of their oppressor.

Plus, the whole advocating for political violence is NOT a sign of a healthy society

Yes, we are not a healthy society

[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Y’all are on the precipice of finding out firsthand the difference between “OMG I’m so oppressed

Sounds like the perspective of a privileged person who's life hasn't been in danger for years because of this person. Why is it bad to celebrate the misfortune of a person who has caused massive harm and is promising to eradicate your kind?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Save a slap for the leap seconds creator.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Or, we could collectively realize time is but an illusion and transcend this silly problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You gotta ~~throw~~ fling your feces at them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

All the waste a plant ever produces in its lifetime can be contained with ease on site.

Won't that create a bunch of targets all over the country? Then terrorists or enemy states can use simple small bombs to make whole areas uninhabitable for the next millennium.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t disagree with you, but this is unrealistic.

But...we don't have a choice if we are to survive. Continuation with any system like our current system (i.e. exploitation of nature for economic growth) will lead to obvious ecological collapse. Why is certain ecological collapse viewed as the more realistic choice?

This is akin to a person well on their way to a heart attack saying "well, eating healthy is unrealistic, so let's switch to diet coke and pretend that's enough"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Sometimes I use the term "psychopathic hoarder class" when referring to this group of people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

I'm still on IPv3, haven't updated yet.

view more: next ›