“Also, that guy over there is using a magnifying glass to light paper on fire, ignore me using napalm since fire is just fire”
meat_popsicle
There is no good excuse to not be on a closed loop system.
But that costs $ and Microsoft doesn’t make money by spending it when they absolutely don’t have to.
Here are the lines from the guy I replied to:
That sounds like censorship to me (and thus, a bad thing)
And…
but I am firmly against any form of censorship.
Allowing any censorship would be a bad thing, according to that poster, so I provided a reason why some censorship may be desired.
Your argument is not on censorship yes or no, but on how far. That’s a different discussion.
Goatse, tubgirl, meatspin, or the BME pain olympics are not exactly hallmarks of quality communication and restricting that type of content is valid for minors. It’s not censorship to try to avoid desensitizing kids too early. Sometimes, people need experience before they can see the horrors.
Hah. As somebody that had to be driven to the bus stop because it was over a mile away, I call BS.
People go to casinos and play slots for a hit of brain chemicals. They’re not there for art. Nor are whales in most mobile games.
I’ll bet some exec thinks an AI-enhanced Skinner box would interesting to see.
You just broke my brain. “Surely no developer could possibly implement something so stupid,” I thought 2 minutes ago before I read that manual.
That’s a real oof right there.
“Manufacturing software that doesn’t suck!”
🤮 yeah right
Sorry, not in budget for this year. Do it in prod and write up the cap-ex proposal for next year.
Non-existent in the US thanks to whack-ass tariffs unfortunately. We love hindering our adoption of climate change reducing technology for political points.
Thanks to federation, the copies of the eggs are. You can’t stop one instance from selling data sourced from federated content until it’s too late.
Companies have up to a 1000-1 ROI on lobbying.
Link
It’s foolish not to buy what’s on sale.