mateomaui

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hotdog with the wrong sauce is just asking for vigilante justice here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I guess. What’s the point in having legal rights if you can’t wield them in court for profit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’ll have to take your word for that. As I said to someone else, if she were on AOL I could totally see that, but it’s more of stretch for me to believe it with Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

If this was grandma on AOL I would probably agree, but this person is cogent enough to actually file a lawsuit because the place she went to search didn’t serve her the ads she wanted. Hard to believe she didn’t also know at the very least that Google or Bing are options. I wouldn’t expect her to know about DuckDuckGo for instance.

edit: and the “95%” part of that reply was what made it more doubtful than anything. If people didn’t make such ridiculous overreaching claims, they’d be more believable. The exaggerations aren’t necessary or valid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Understood, not sure why the jellyfin and kodi plugins would behave differently, but it seems that’s the case. It’s possible the kodi one is still in development and one day I’ll be forced to sign in again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t know if you have a jellyfin option, I don’t use that, which I why my reply mentioned kodi.

Another reply of mine in here explains the differences observed in the .org/.com plugins from my end. Again, it may not matter for you.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Yes, I am baffled that anyone, with Facebook’s reputation for ads, selling personal information, etc, would choose to search for insurance carriers there instead of any number of other options that aren’t that big a leap away from Facebook, bruh.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Yeah, I understand that, which brings up the second baffling point that someone went to facebook to search for insurance providers in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Based on the descriptions they seem the same except for .org/.com, and looks like the .com has an extra dependency “opensubtitlesdev” and maybe is a newer plugin? v1.0.2 vs v5.1.4? AlI know for certain is that the .org insists I login and is generally a pain in the ass, and the .com doesn’t require me to login and hasn’t failed me yet. Which, of course, may change.

edit: oddly enough the .com plugin description also tells you to register/import your account on opensubtitles.com before use, and to my knowledge I’ve done no such thing and still haven’t logged in to the plugin.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Someone is angry because they’re not getting ads on Facebook?

That’s a switch.

view more: ‹ prev next ›