Weird, I've never needed root to make that happen. I used to just disable the built-in YouTube and then set Vanced as the URL handler for YouTube URLs, and then they'd open in Vanced. Maybe that doesn't work on every Android variant?
mammut
Is there a disadvantage to ReVanced without root? Back in the Vanced days, I actually had less trouble with non-root on my OnePlus vs. rooted on my LG. I had to reinstall the rooted version every boot for some reason I never understood.
Figures, but disappointing.
This is pretty much my thought. It's an enjoyable movie, but I've always been of the opinion that "enjoyable" and "good" aren't the same thing.
There are good movies and music that I don't enjoy, and they're are movies and music I enjoy that aren't good.
AFAIK Google isn't mirroring any of the binary stuff anyway though, are they? So how big is it? Surely with proper text compression it's under 100TB. That's 5 large hard drives at this point.
Are they adding back AVX512?
Yeah, it needs to get into Internet Archive stat.
I realize that, but they don't offer a read-only plan either. He's been paying for something, whether it's an official plan or not. If they sent an email saying that you can keep your data in read-only mode, and he kept paying the bill, they should've stuck with that.
I do realize it's Google and they can't be trusted to not fuck this up, but everyone is talking like this guy was just expecting Google to keep letting him access his data without paying a bill. The email they sent me basically said that I can keep paying my bill, and they'll keep my data, but I can't add any new data until I get under the quota. This is a plan that they offered to these people.
AFAIK they keep charging you once it goes read-only. Does it say he quit paying? I've got an account that went read-only after the grace period, and they still bill it every month.
Where does it say he quit paying? I have a Google account in read-only mode from about the same time period, and they keep charging me for it.
You know, I've routinely been surprised what gamers do and don't put up with, so I really don't know what to expect anymore.
I dunno if you remember how gamers responded when Steam came out, but they really, really hated it. And it wasn't just the issues with slow internet, bugs in Steam, and stuff like that. They seemed to kinda philosophically hate it. Even the gaming magazines ran articles about how it ruined software ownership, it was awful how it made it so that you couldn't even do things like give your old games to your kids or your friends, etc. And gamer forums had the same kinda complaints. And it was even worse since Valve forced people to start using Steam to keep playing CS, even though CS had previously not required Steam.
But fast forward to some years later, and nobody cares about any of that stuff. Well, I guess they do sometimes. People complained about Epic moving Rocket League to EGS, which was kinda funny since it was moving from a service that had, years prior angered people when it started being required for a different hit multiplayer game.
Anyway, I could see gamers complaining and then just getting onboard 5-10 years later. That's what they usually do if the developers they like push for it.
Looks like some kinda scaling artifact. It's probably from processing of the screenshot and not anything to do with the way the app actually renders fonts.