There's an enemy
Living inside of me
And he's been wasting my time, wasting my time
-waste by David Vertesi
(Adult diagnosis of ADHD)
m0darn
joined 1 year ago
examples where one would notice a flaw without having some kind of input on how to get around said flaw
Middle East
There, Loss.
Yeah, I think it was conspiracy to commit suicide.
I think a lot of the time people see stupidity in differences of values and limited visibility of the context the decision was made. I think this is why so many people think so many people are stupid. 'Stupid people' make choices that the observer sees as having 'poor results'.
Like when a lane ends on the highway:
-- People are stupid (and selfish) for not letting cars in when their lane ends (dangerous)
--People are stupid (and selfish) for waiting until the last minute to move over (dangerous)
-- People are stupid for moving over well before their lane ends (missed opportunity to get ahead)
-- people are stupid for being in either of those lanes that merge when there is a third lane that doesn't merge.... (short sighted and dangerous) (no I won't let them in! They should have thought ahead)
--People are stupid (and selfish) for driving cars (dangerous, climate change)
--People are stupid for thinking it's reasonable to live without a car (missed opportunity to get ahead)
Not me though, I consider everything from all sides all the time no matter what. Anyone that doesn't invest their time like this to make decisions is... stupid. (/s)
I mean you could get a pump to boost the flow, and a big tankless water heater right? Put the pump at the main water supply valve and run a dedicated line to the shower.
Indubitably.
Everyone Do Your Thing, Just Eat Doritos, Hershey's, Green Mountain Dew & Happy Meals.
I'm not the person you were responding to, but found your question interesting.
I re-read most of the Wikipedia article on Markan Priority. Imo These parts of the article sum up the argument nicely.
While Marcan priority easily sees Matthew and Luke building upon Mark by adding new material, Marcan posteriority must explain some surprising omissions. Mark has no infancy narrative nor any version of the Lord's Prayer, for example.
...
Nor does Mark have more than a handful of unique pericopes. This is expected under Marcan priority, where Matthew has reused nearly everything he found in Mark, but if Mark was written last, it is harder to explain why so little new material was added.
...
There are very few passages in Mark with no parallel in either Matthew or Luke, which makes them all the more significant [...] If Mark is drawn from Matthew and Luke, it is hard to see why so little material would be added, if anything were going to added at all, and the choice of additions is also rather strange. On the other hand, if Mark was written first, it is easier to see why Matthew and Luke would omit these passages.
Chatgpt 3.5 is free. Can't get more student priced than that.
Yeah, my point was I don't think there are many offering the service for free. And they are probably looking for revenue streams.
Suppose you ignore students running their own LLMs offline on their gaming gpus
I actually feel like this is the one that shouldn't be ignored. But I don't have a good sense of the computational power vs quality output.
It's still wildly impractical because students can paraphrase LLM output into something that doesn't look like the original output.
At least doing that is likely to result in the student internalizing the information to some degree. It's also not so different (not at all different?) from the most benign academic dishonesty that existed when I was a student.
One issue with the approach I suggested is the copyright issue of profs submitting students' original work for AI processing without understanding/caring about copyright implications.
Was this car the inspiration for the simpsons episode where home designed a car? (And ruined his brother's company)