Phrasing and content are quite different, even if the points end up being the almost the same.
This post "feels" a great deal more relatable, I don't think AI applies, or at least, I'm not familiar with the issue you are outlining.
lonke
joined 1 year ago
Well, the data it was trained on had a cutoff point in 2021 which would explain that.
I've used it (GPT 3) a fair amount for Unity, and I'm fairly pleased with the results, it's saved me a fair amount of time. Implementing object pooling and editor window dialogues for scene translation management for example.
Of course, programming knowledge is required for it to be of consistent use, which, on second thought, may not be at all obvious.
ChatGPT is GPT 3.5 & GPT 4, as far as I'm aware.
3.5 is also very capable when it comes to programming, for any well known framework or language. It's not as capable, but it is still very capable.
Not everyone with an attention span longer than yours is ChatGPT.
Assuming you've even read THIS far, that comment lacks all of the common gpt hallmarks.
I use ChatGPT primarily for programming, and it's particularly well suited for programming.
"Even get basic programming questions right if you are detailed with your prompt"
is underselling its capabilities in that regard. Especially GPT-4 has been able to help me with everything from obscure adobe ExtendScript scripts to infrequently seen 'unsafe' C# OpenGL perspective matrix math. All with prompts of a sentence maximum.
Native procedural dark mode, Developer CSS Overview, browser extension file access.
I use Firefox exclusively except for when the second one is useful. I really wish Firefox had those three though.