lengau

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In Python it's really hard!

def __eq__(self, other):
    ...

How do you even write those subscripted hyphens???

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And in a mirror universe where that decision got made someone's arguing "maybe we shouldn't have cut funding to Israel if it meant allowing the genocide in Ukraine."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

A few off the top of my head:

  • Every time I try it I have installation issues, across a wide variety of hardware. (Newbies have also reported to me that "Linux can't even install" after trying Mint - when I sit them down with a Kubuntu install on the same machine it tends to go flawlessly)
  • Cinnamon seems to have stability issues (this is one of the more common things I've had now ie friends complain about and ask for help with)
  • the blocking of snapd in the repos and the way it's done can be pretty confusing to newbies when they click a "get it on the snap store" button and things just fall apart. (I also think their blocking of snapd itself is fairly user hostile, but the fact that the UX around it is so bad is also a problem)
  • On the subject of blocking packages in the repos - their own packages seem to have file conflicts with the Ubuntu repos they use but don't put the relevant "Conflicts" lines in their deb metadata, which I've seen cause conflicts for newbies that break apt. (KDE Neon does a much better job of taking care of this IMO, but I certainly don't view it as a beginner friendly distro either)
  • The lack of a Plasma version is a major downside to me. (Random aside: I once had a newbie ask me how she could get the pretty version of Linux I had because hers was so ugly - she was running stock Mint and I was on Fedora's KDE spin)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I really don't get why so many people call Mint good for beginners. There are so many reasons it's not, yet it has this incredibly vocal crowd who insist it's so fantastic.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Cars. They ruin cities.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I'm not here to change your mind, but man... Mint and Manjaro are not great introductions to Linux IMO.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So Earth was basically Ferenginar.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

My laptop had 2 USB4 with type C connectors, a USB 3.2 type A connector and a USB 3.2 type C connector, but recently it's had an HDMI connector instead of the 3.2 type C.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That's hard to say. With the current makeup of the supreme court, it's likely they'd simply declare any law protecting abortion rights as unconstitutional because mumble mumble and get away with it. But what's preventing them from doing even that is that Republicans (thanks in large part to politicised redrawing of district boundaries) have a majority in one of the two legislative bodies, so the Democrats couldn't pass that protection regardless.

So likely the minimum that's needed to codify abortion rights would be a Democratic majority in both legislative houses and a Democratic president.

On the topic of coalitions: The US doesn't have coalitions in the ways many other countries have, partially because of the way the president is elected. Voters have a separate item on their ballot to elect (electors who will then vote in the electoral college for) the president. The way this occurs is through first past the post, where the largest portion of the votes (even if a minority) gets all the electors in that state (except in Nebraska and New Hampshire, where the state breaks it into districts). I'm in Michigan, for example. In 2016, Donald Trump got 47.5% of the vote in Michigan to Hillary Clinton's 47.3% and thus got all 16 of Michigan's electoral votes (out of 538). Had 11,000 more people voted for Clinton (let's say, by not voting for the Green party), she would have won Michigan's electoral votes, which is a 3% swing in the electoral college, but given that most states are pretty much guaranteed to go one way or the other (e.g. Indiana is a safe Republican state while neighbouring Illinois is a safe Democratic state), those 11,000 votes would be massively influential. This is why "swing states" are so stupidly pivotal in US elections.

So because of all of that, there's not an option for the Greens to join a coalition, even if they wanted to (which I don't think they would, as the US Green party is currently under the control of a Russian asset and it's well known that Putin wants a Trump victory).

The American electoral system is ridiculously, stupidly backwards and basically designed to empower certain people over others. If there were a parliamentary democracy here the US, and probably the world (given the US's love for foreign intervention), would be much better off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FPTP is only one problem with the system. But it's still a problem pretty much everywhere that has it. There are many other things that make it particularly worse in the US, but that doesn't make it not a problem with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The overturning of Roe vs. Wade was a direct consequence of Trump's election, as it was the three justices he was able to appoint (including Mitch McConnell's fuckery about Merrick Garland) who changed the Supreme Court's makeup to include so many right-wing partisans.

view more: next ›