laughterlaughter

Thank you for your service, ociffer.

I'm curious enough to continue the conversation, if only because talking about definitions is interesting. So I'm not being confrontational, I actually want to have a discussion.

You say that all soaps are antibacterial because the result in the end is that no bacteria remains on the hands. I see what you're saying there. But anti-bacterial soap kills the bacteria, including the remaining ones that couldn't be removed.

That's like saying that removing a group of humans based on ethnicity from a region, without killing them, amounts to genocide. Would you say that's genocide too?* (And I know the comparison is extreme.)

*I think I read somewhere that forcibly removing people from a region amounts to genocide, though. But you know what I mean...

I hope you were being sarcastic...

that let's you deepfake

that lets* you deepfake

I mean. 95% of people uses, likes and tolerates shit I don't tolerate. I don't use said shit. My life has been shockingly fine that way.

A site that does this is a site I'll never visit.

Oh.

I guess both actions have ups and downs.

To me, calling it Twitter reminds me of the shitty shit Twitter has ever been. I never liked the thing. I vividly remember when BBC started quoting random tweets - it made me a little sick. Then all news outlets followed suit.

And if Elon hates it that people call it Twitter, then even better!

I'm not talking about elections.

Alternative pronunciation: Shittier.

But that's what Elon wants, and fuck that guy.

Twitter or Xitter for me. Maaaaybe X (formerly known as Twitter), but never X alone.

Especially because it's a fucking confusing name in a tech space. I swear I thought the headline referred to X Window at first.