kixik

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The phone doesn't poll, instead it goes to sleep, and gets awakened by the push notifications. Just like GCM/FCM ones. Part of the key thing, because not any one can self host, is that it requires very little information in comparison, and some providers are open source and even free SW. The one I use is ntfy, there's the next cloud (next push), and not long ago you can use the conversation push service (up.conversation.im) through the Convesations xmpp client. I was aware of Conversations capable of becoming a unified push distributor, but actually was looking for it to use a unified push distributor instead.

But I was informed already it's not necessary, and doesn't make much sense, by being very low power consumer, even though it requires to keep unrestricted battery consumption on the background. So no issues by Conversations not supporting using a unified push notifications distributor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It depends on the distributor:

https://unifiedpush.org/users/distributors

And how much info they collect. I understand the ntfy requires is really bare minimum compared to what GCM/FCM asks and collects.

On mobile, it's sort of a needed if you one doesn't wand to use GCM/FCM which is really bad privacy wise, and particularly needed on peer to peer applications, because they tend to drain the battery...

Some other benefit is that for those who can, they can self-host ntfy, nextcloud with unified push provider, and so on...

On the list of apps supporting unifid push, I even see element (matrix), but I don't identify any xmpp one:

https://unifiedpush.org/users/apps

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yeap, I noticed it being a unified push distributor, actually in its settings on can find the option to enable it.

OK, I won't worry about battery usage then. But the argument about unified push notifications not being useful, but the GCM/FCM actually found useful is somehow hard to understand. But I understand what you're saying about battery usage. Thanks a lot !

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

If the distro supports apparmor, then firejail + apparmor offer together sandboxing for quite a set of applications (apparmor includes few profiles by itself, but firejal has quite a few, and one can enable apparmor on all, or the ones wnated). Arch has pretty good wikies about firejail + apparmor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Jami doesn't require a phone number, which is p2p. Xmpp (+ Omemo) doesn't require a phone number and it's federated... I mean, if a service is willing to rid of phone numbers, it'll do totally without them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Being using mull for so long, even when it was not available on f-droid official repos, but only divestos f-droid repo.

The only thing really bothering on mull is a config one really must change, security.OCSP.require, the default to true prevents reaching several sites. But other than that mull shouldn't get in your way, and one can change other config to one's liking if in need.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Jami with unifiedPush notifications is a pretty good option

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Why not looking for distributed mechanism, which don't depend on trusting central servers or particular instances on decentralized mechanisms, like jami, or similar?

view more: ‹ prev next ›