kernelle

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Exactly! When you pay for a service you own the copyright, like having a photoshop license. I meant in other situations where it's free or provided as research tools to engineers under a company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The existing legal precedence

I know that's how law works, but there is no precedent for AI at this scale and will only get worse. What if AI gains full sentience? Are they a legally recognised person? Do they have rights and do they not own the copyright themselves? All very good questions with no precedent in law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah I was just showing an example! There is much more to it then just commercial, but it's a very quick way get the attention of businesses. Whether it be direct or indirect.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I'll compare it with the recent takedown of the Switch emulator Yuzu. It's my understanding they actively solicited donations and piracy, both of which could be seen as commercial activities. Which in a project of that scale the latter was their downfall, meanwhile Ryujinx is still up and running. But we'll see if that remains true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Really? Even if your artwork isn't used in a commercial way?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Not necessarily, if a model is public domain, there could still be a lot of proprietary elements used in interpreting that model and actually running it. If you own the hardware and generate something using AI, I'd say the copyright goes to you. You use AI as the brush to paint your painting and the painting belongs to you, but if a company allows you to use their canvas and their painting tools, it should go to them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Great articles, first is one of the best I've read about the implications of fair use. I argue that because of the broadness of human knowledge that is interpreted through these models, everyone is entitled to have unrestricted access to them (not the servers or algorithms used, the models). I'll dub it "the library of the digital age" argument.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 7 months ago (23 children)

"Publicly available data" - I wonder if that includes Disney's catalogue? Or Nintendo's IP? I think they are veeery selective about their "Publicly available data", it also implies the only requirement for such training data is that it is publicly available, which almost every piece of media ever? How an AI model isn't public domain by default baffles me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Definitely, good thing button mapping is becoming more mainstream.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

That is so interesting, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I don't know about this one, I have ps/xbox brain as well, but putting confirm on the right side somehow always made more sense to me, even though my muscle memory doesn't agree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fuck yes, enjoy bud. I've read people not using high enough rated welding goggles and getting eye damage though. I'd stay on the safe side and get appropriate solar eclipse glasses. You'll be looking directly at the sun for several minutes after all.

view more: ‹ prev next ›