Of course it is, but if you bought at cents and sell at $50K, then you're only scamming rich assholes anyway.
(And now you're the rich asshole!)
Of course it is, but if you bought at cents and sell at $50K, then you're only scamming rich assholes anyway.
(And now you're the rich asshole!)
Besides moving to linux sooner, I would not dual boot at all, since I almost never used the other system.
<- should be learning for his comp-sci final whatever right now. I was hoping it would get better. And then sunk cost fallacy...
One could argue there aren't enough pixels and the artist just "filled in the blanks"
Nah, not just monetary gain! Just wanted to get in front of the most obvious answer.
Ah, nice! I tried to avoid powershell while on windows, so don't know much about it.
You can get all the IDs using yt-dlp
yt-dlp --flat-playlist --print id <playlist>
Assuming you're on linux, you can add >> ids_all.txt
at the end to save the list to a file.
You can also add
--compat-options no-youtube-unavailable-videos
to get only the list of available videos instead and then, again assuming you're on linux, do
diff ids_all.txt ids_available.txt
to get the odd ones out. That's the simplest I could come up with. You'll have to hope you can use the wayback machine, or a good old exact search to turn up what video that ID actually referred to
what are your strategies against such sites tracking you?
Close and never go there again. If I'm bit enough times, it goes in the hosts file for blocking. If I really need the stuff on there, I try archived versions on web.archive.org or archive.today
My point was that it's not so much "fair reasoning" as just a statement of that fact.
That's just saying "we want to sell access to our code, so we can't make it open source". Basically the definition of proprietary software, no?
I agree and always write it like that at first, but it's also true that for example fifty kilodollars (50k$) just looks better as $50k
...although it might just be silly enough that it works...