joe

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, that's a good point but I still think there are better services than Twitter/microblogging for that. Like our old friend RSS

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Sure, but you can get that with something more long-form, too; it's not exclusive to Twitter/microblogging .

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I would argue that the format incentivizes short quips and discussions lacking nuance in favor of brevity, and yes, therefore it's "bad" (to use their term) to use Twitter even if musk wasn't turning it into Truth Social.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Well, arguably the microblogging format does have some intrinsic disadvantages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Are you speaking legally or morally when you say someone "aught" to do something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You most certainly can. The discussion about whether copyright applies to the output is nuanced but certainly valid, and notably separate from whether copyright allows copyright holders to restrict who or what gets trained on their work after it's released for general consumption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article is literally about someone suing to prevent their art from being used for training. That's the topic at hand.

Are you confused, or are you trying to shoehorn a different but related discussion into this one?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I was under the impression we were talking about using copyright to prevent a work from being used to train a generative model. There's nothing in copyright that says anything about training anything. I'm not even convinced there should be.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

There's nothing in copyright law that covers this scenario, so anyone that says it's "absolutely" one way or the other is telling you an opinion, not a fact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well feel free to drop a DM to me directly when you get it up and running and I'll give it a look, for sure.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I would probably watch a youtube channel that focused more on how to improvise in cooking than how to follow a recipe, along with pointing out various useful techniques and pitfalls to avoid.

Hell, this might actually already exist. I confess I've never really looked.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure Tasker can make non-dismissible notifications.

Though, if a notification will actually stop you from drunk dialing, you could always change your wallpaper to something like "Don't drunk dial".

view more: next ›