jerkface

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (17 children)

The more animal flesh you consume, the younger you die and the more major diseases you suffer. Google: "all cause mortality meat".

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (27 children)

The experiences of animals are real and matter. Their suffering is identical in nature to your own. Your moral perspective demands that you deny or ignore these facts. If you can deny that an animal's experience has any value, you can do the same to a human.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago

I oppose human reproduction. Even if it would be funny.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The idea of PT being able to compete and differentiate itself from Google to content creators by paying them money is ridiculous. You're attempting to attack the main strength of the competition, and they are way, way, way, WAY better at it than you are. It's fucking doomed from the start. You have to play to your strengths, and manufacturing commercial content for revenue is just not what PeerTube's design is even intended for.

Ten years ago you could have made an exciting pitch involving a block chain that pays hosters and content creators but now we can see how stupid that is. Well it doesn't get less stupid without the blockchain.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What if I'm not manufacturing content, what if I just have things I want to say? Why can't we have one fucking platform that isn't monetized?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

okay? it's meeting my use cases, tell me why I care?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean it's not hard to find my PT server with my content on it. And yeah, NO ONE IS EVERY GOING TO PAY TO SEE MY CONTENT. That's kind of my point. There's millions of people producing content THAT IS NOT COMMERCIALLY VIABLE, and they do this even though it doesn't pay the rent. Like, I honestly don't even know what your point is except to deny reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

You might not say one seventh (sic presumably quarter is meant) of January, but you'd still be correct in every sense (except, again, mathematically) if you did.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So, the way you have phrased this is blatantly ableist. It's like you're saying you hate people who are blind because they refuse to learn to read. You're annoyed with people who CHOOSE not to learn, and attacking other people who have a disability. Don't use the technical terms for actual disabilities when that's not what you are talking about. Your friend isn't "OCD" because they like when things match.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Why does PT have to be a place that creators get paid? Yes, that is essential if we want peertube to TAKE OVER THE WORLD. But what is wrong with providing a platform that ISN'T driven by content revenue along side YouTube? Those creators have needs that aren't being catered to elsewhere.

view more: ‹ prev next ›