jarfil

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Last time SWIM used a patcher, it came with a malware dropper. Is that still how this "free" works?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Both:

dialog_error = Dialog_plain.create_modal(error_text)

Variable and class names go from more general to more particular, functions begin with a verb.

Global functions are either "main", or start with one of "debug", "todo", or "shit".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I've had to deal with this on the data collection end, and it's a PITA to build in the mechanisms to fully follow the law. If you're an EU resident, and especially if the server is in the EU or has to follow EU agreements, then they'd risk some quite high penalties if they didn't follow it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Ownership comes with both rights and responsibilities.

Platforms want as many of the rights as possible, without the responsibilities... which is why they have a contract (TOS) where they explicitly renounce to ownership, leaving it for the user, and only license the rights.

If platforms took full ownership, like in a "work for hire" agreement, they would be responsible for any illegal content a user could upload, since it wouldn't be the user's content anymore. Obviously they don't want that.

A side effect of wanting as much content as possible without owning it, is that... well, they don't own it. 😎

Fediverse where there's no owner/seller/buyer of your data or anything else you contributed.

Incorrect. You get ownership of anything that's yours, then upload stuff under whatever TOS your instance has... what's that? it has no TOS? Then they're in for a rough awakening some day. 🤷

Whether there are sellers/buyers... is something we'll learn in time. For now, user generated content on the Fediverse gets shared with little regard or protection of anyone's rights, so anyone can make a compilation, bundle it up, slap a price tag on it, and try to sell it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

places an undue burden onto the user to determine and explain why data might be personal

The other way around: all data originating from a person, is by default "personal data", and the burden of explaining which one is not, lies with whoever is keeping it.

you can't look at any messages in any rooms you've been kicked out of

If they're keeping them, then you can request a GDPR export of ALL your data. Doesn't matter whether some interface or application allows you access to the data or not, or even if you've been banned from the whole platform; as long as they keep the data, they have an obligation to honor your rights of:

  • Access
  • Correction/Modification
  • Removal

Even during obligatory data retention periods, when they can't remove the data and only make it inaccessible, you still have the right to get a copy of your own personal data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

IIRC, one of the LLMs (was it OpenAI?) that crawled Reddit, had to manually remove subs like r/counting because they were messing with the training.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

As long as the link between data and user is severed, they are compliant with GDPR. [...] As long as it's not personally identifiable, it's OK.

Wrong.

In the US, data protection refers to "personally identifiable" data, so severing the link is enough. Under the GDPR, all "personal" data is protected, doesn't matter if it has a link or not to identify the person.

The test under the GDPR, will be whether a comment has any personal data in it. If it's a generic "LMAO", then leaving it anonymous might be enough; if it is a "look at me [photo attached]" or an "AITA [personal story]", then the person can ask for it to be removed, not just anonymized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The difference is: Reddit doesn't own the content, they can't stop anyone else from selling it, or giving it for free; only the users could (the actual owners).

There are Reddit content dumps out there, which Reddit can't stop anyone from using... so not sure what they are selling, but if it's just that, then they're scamming people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

From the TOS/EULA, the content belongs to each user, they just license it to Reddit to use as it pleases.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The kernel is fine, it's been in the hands of pretty cool people since at least NT. As for the stuff running on it, well...... 😗🎶

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Git is easy: the key part is picking a GUI you feel comfortable with.

view more: next ›