ironsoap

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Indeed, I'm feeling lazy and need a non-ai translator please... ?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

If approved, it will affect all Safari certificates, which follows a similar push by Google, that plans to reduce the max-validity period on Chrome for these digital trust files down to 90 days.

Max lifespans of certs have been gradually decreasing over the years in an ongoing effort to boost internet security. Prior to 2011, they could last up to about eight years. As of 2020, it's about 13 months.

Apple's proposal would shorten the max certificate lifespan to 200 days after September 2025, then down to 100 days a year later and 45 days after April 2027. The ballot measure also reduces domain control validation (DCV), phasing that down to 10 days after September 2027.

And while it's generally agreed that shorter lifespans improve internet security overall — longer certificate terms mean criminals have more time to exploit vulnerabilities and old website certificates — the burden of managing these expired certs will fall squarely on the shoulders of systems administrators.

Over the past couple of days, these unsung heroes who keep the internet up and running flocked to Reddit to bemoan their soon-to-be increasing workload. As one noted, while the proposal "may not pass the CABF ballot, but then Google or Apple will just make it policy anyway…"

...

However, as another sysadmin pointed out, automation isn't always the answer. "I've got network appliances that require SSL certs and can't be automated," they wrote. "Some of them work with systems that only support public CAs."

Another added: "This is somewhat nightmarish. I have about 20 appliance like services that have no support for automation. Almost everything in my environment is automated to the extent that is practical. SSL renewal is the lone achilles heel that I have to deal with once every 365 days."

Until next year, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Cross posting to facepalm, extremelyinfuriating, or rage does seem more appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Incredibly hostile design. I generally avoid, but like Reddit they have hostage to some info I desire sometime so wipe my way through it... Close the browser, rm -rf /, and wash my hands.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Sounds like fandom.com

Even when disabled at a high level, their sub checks are still there and there are hundred of them. Deceptive BS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed, now the fun part of coming up with a legal basis to do so and convincing regulators.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't think this requires an act of congress. I think you might see more consumer advocation on the part of FTC (although it doesn't currently regulate online broadcast), or potentially the CFPB.

Admittedly it's more likely to see the EU do some regulations, but it all depends on the election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'd you have android, I recommended newpipe or one of it's fork like tubular. Or Seal or it's fork Ytdlnis.

There are several front ends for yt-dlp on Mac and Windows as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I miss it all the time. I wish Pixels would get off their internal storage racket, or at least give you extremely large options.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

While I agree, I have a hard time seeing how people will stop using it until the field changes. Maybe in 10 years it will the the MySpace of the sitcom era, but right now it's still growing. That growth is giving it carte blanche to manipulate the users as it sees fit. Regulation might impact it, but it's still a bit of a Goliath.

  • Compared to 2023, YouTube’s user base has grown by 20 million this year, representing a 0.74% increase. From Global media insights

Also the active user base is 2.7 billion people in 2024 from the same source above.

The alternatives are out there, but just not in the same league.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yt-DLP and it's variation (Seal, YTDLnis, etc.), newpipe and it's variation (Tubular, Newpipe Sponsorblock, etc) already allow you to do this without having to get manual.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What's the privacy criteria you are thinking about?

view more: next ›