How are they supposed to know what to search for? Try and understand someone who doesn't know what you know.
irmoz
What if you've never heard of "user agents" before?
Kids aren't being "coerced into being gay". That's a batshit statement right there.
Also, slavery is always bad. End of story. Putting any leeway in there is disgusting.
I'm not pushing anything, but yeah, anything other than blockchain
You're dodging the point that being in favour of decentralising doesn't mean being a blockchain bro
Yes, I feel entitled to content people provide for free consumption. Because they would like it to be freely consumed. I have been on both ends of this (creator and consumer) and I 100% agree. If I release something for free, I don't want some corporation inserting themselves between me and my consumers, to make money from content i released for free. And moreover, to then use my content as a method of collecting demographic information to sell and make further money... why is it "entitled" to be against this?
What about all the vital information on there? Education, news, etc?
Try harder, dear.
Quit being smug and cryptic, out with your point.
You claimed that they see a single source and are just satisfied based on the existence of any paper. That is not an accurate or justified interpretation of their statement.
Studies suggesting something don't definitively prove it, sure, because, as you say, contrary evidence can exist. But no one claimed that - they just said studies "back it up". This is true. Studies can indeed "back up" claims.
She really did "just wear a kimono":
https://www.glamour.com/story/qipao-prom-dress-controversy-response