intrepid

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't overthink it. Just publish. And as for entitled users, remember that you don't owe them. If anyone insists on a feature, tell them that you can prioritize them for the right fee.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Talking about ingredient X, why was there a huge glass flask full of it right above the tank for the professor to accidentally break it?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It's likely that GenZ is just fatigued and apathetic to climate change. They might have just resigned to their fate, knowing the world governments and greedy corporate vermin won't let anything meaningful happen in their lifetime.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Least important it may be. But it is the most significant. This scheme follows the conventional scheme we follow while writing numbers - the most significant digit to the left and significance reducing as we move right.

The advantage of YYYY-MM-DD becomes when you add time to it in ISO-8601 or RFC 3339 format: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss. All the digits are uniformly decreasing in significance from left to right.

This becomes even more apparent if you are trying to sort by time - say, a stack of files, or datetime in a computer. Try doing this with any other scheme.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

He should keep it and rename himself. It suits him more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

China is the main driver of growth in RISC-V currently. But we need to see how the trade wars will affect that. There was a recent news about RISC-V specifically in this regard.

We might also see more activity from Intel, Qualcomm and Nvidia.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

RISC-V instruction set (ISA) is open source. But the actual implementation (microarchitecture) has no such obligations. And among the implementations that can run Linux, none (that I know) are open source designs.

With regards to hardware backdoors - no, closed source RISC-V implementations are not easier than x86 or ARM to audit for security.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

In what world would Microsoft allow the Linux name to appear before Windows? If MS were a person, they would be diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Do you know that there is a Linux port of DirectX that runs only with WSL?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back when Microsoft started showing interest in and contributing to Linux, I knew that they were up to something no good like this. But honestly, anyone who thinks that WSL running inside a very abusive Windows environment is an alternative to true Linux/BSD experience, is frankly clueless. They deserve everything MS subjects them to.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Ooh! Looks like 9 muskrats who pre-ordered the stupidtruck ended up here by mistake, instead of on X.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The fundamental problem here is those monopolies having unfettered access to regulatory law making processes. Right now it's as if these companies are free to regulate themselves and everyone is unhappy because they misuse those powers to enrich themselves at the cost of everyone else. The minimum requirement is to break them up for such overreach.

view more: ‹ prev next ›