iheartneopets

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Amazing, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would you mind telling me which model you have? I'm looking to pick one up used on ebay or something :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Now that I'm canceling Max, I'm basically just left with Crunchyroll and Shudder as streaming services. They've all become so shit, I couldn't stomach giving them any more money.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Literally fucking every place now and I hate it. Ordering take out food that I am picking up myself? It's "swipe your card here and it's going to ask you a question". Literally everywhere. Even places designed to be walk-up and get your food and leave, like a local smoothie place or something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I know, this is a horrible thing to go through but at the same time my eyes are watering from laughing so hard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I don't want YouTube Music. I want to watch quality videos without ads where my money benefits creators first, not a corporation first.

So by those metrics, Nebula is still a better bargain for me and a better place to spend my money.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nebula has much cheaper pricing than YouTube, and gives creators much more control over their content. I'd rather give my money to them than a company that spends every waking moment thinking about how to screw me and its creators over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Okay, but this was more than prerelease hype. This was showing footage to players things they can do, with the explicit intention of driving up pre-orders and day one sales (I think pre-ordering is extremely silly, I don't participate, but that's neither here nor there). Lying about your product to get people to pay $60 for it is extremely unethical, and some EU governments found it to be enough to take them to court over. So this is beyond your personal 'judgments'. Sorry.

Limiting this arbitrary contest to just AAA games is pretty silly, seeing as they have the budget to hire amazing writers, and some of them get blown out of the water by indie titles. That's not the argument you think it is. Gaming is just wider than that, and I would argue the boundaries should be expanded to include all entertainment seeing as all forms of entertainment are making a bid for your limited time/attention, but that's just me. If you must have ONLY AAA games, then Red Dead games, GTA, and Mass Effect games are some from off the top of my head. Granted I don't play that many.

Your bar for labor-of-love must be really really low if a game just working is enough for you. That same year, No Man's Sky was much more deserving of the award as it isn't being made by a corporation with endless resources, and yet it managed to improve itself at least twice as much.

Tbh, you writing out several paragraphs defending yourself for enjoying Cyberpunk kinda smells like fanboy behavior to me. You try to be reductionist and dismissive a lot in what you wrote, which is pretty lame and anti-intellectual. We're here to discuss the facts, not what you enjoy spending your money on. More power to you, spend your money however, but I'm not here to discuss that with you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Okay, I just want to clear up that bugs were not the only reason people were upset. They literally were hyping things up prerelease that weren't even in the game. That's why they spent so much time being sued in the EU for it.

The writing is also amateurish, and there's a lot of 'cyber' but not a lot of 'punk'. People were right to be upset, and personally I think they still should be. The only reason their PR got turned around was because of an anime that released based in the world, and now suddenly the game's being handed 'labor of love' awards—they hadn't even done much to fix up the game at that point!

So yeah. Not just bugs. I'm sure I'm even missing things.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The amount of gaslighting I've seen gamers do to themselves over this game has been wild. "Is it me? Maybe I'm the problem. Maybe I just don't like games anymore?"

They'd rather do that than admit that a Bethesda game kinda sucks. And if you say it's not good, people will come after you. The super Bethesda defenders keep claiming the game is getting review bombed, but from what I've seen it's the other way around. If you say something negative about it, people will jump on your case. I've seen so many streamers and YouTubers try and cover their asses when trying to speak critically about this game to keep the Todd brigade from forming a mob in their comment sections.

It's been such a wild game release.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I feel like I'm in some sort of fugue state with everyone comparing this to Skyrim. In what way is this like Skyrim? Skyrim, for all its flaws, at least had hand crafted worlds with interesting things to see and do in them. From what I've seen of Starfield, that has been completely replaced by procedurally generated barren worlds. Like yeah, you can 'explore' them, but for what? What is there even to find?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly I don't know why you care so much. This isn't debate class, I don't really need to defend myself to some rando on the internet who decided to make a corporation their white-knight crusade for the day. I detailed an experience I had with the company a few years back. That's it. I'm not going back to them, because like most streaming platforms I think they're shite.

view more: ‹ prev next ›