homoludens

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

IMO the problem for developers is that they have to provide general solutions, so they have to cover each case all the time instead of just a singular case at a time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Obligatory video when it comes to time zones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5wpm-gesOY

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

What exactly did she do that is concerning?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The thing about open tabs is that they are already open, I don't need to do anything to put down the note. And I'd usually need to open the site again to continue working - and often other sites as well (that are now also already open in tabs nearby). So I use them even though I kinda hate them. I just wish I could organize them easier.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago

Mastodon is written in Ruby. Nowhere near as big as Facebook or the ML field yet

FTFY ;)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Windows only :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

How did we even end up in a situation like this?

Capitalism ;)

If donations through Patreon were the only way for artists to get money, I don’t think we would have very many high quality movies, series, albums, paintings or sculptures.

This sounds obvious, because if people don't need to worry about money they can invest more time and effort into their art.

But a. this does not mean it's fair. Not within the art scenes (because a lot of people are working hard but don't have the luck for a breakthrough) and certainly not compared to other jobs.

And b. while a movie like Lord of the Rings or a series like the Sopranos do need a lot of money, many expensive movies are actually rather boring because they have to play it safe in order not to risk a fuckton of money. On the other hand, many great movies had a rather small budget. Avengers: Endgame could have paid for 100x Whiplash or Trainspotting, and I'd rather have more of those. And I think movies/series are the outlier - music is much cheaper to make.

But it's hard to solve or even discuss all this in some lemmy comment ;-)

I feel like it might not be sustainable

The current system however is definitely not sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

To some extent, piracy still does reduce the demand for the pirated material, so there’s an indirect harm associated with it, and that’s what makes it unethical

I get your point, especially when it concerns smaller/independent artists. But how would a "fair compensation" look like? Do top selling artists deserve the millions (or even billions) of dollars? Does someone even deserve hundreds of thousands of dollars? Does any artist deserve more money for doing something they love and where they can express themselves than a nurse working night shifts? Is it fair to keep earning money for some work that was done years ago? Does that mean a nurse should get a percentage of the income of every person's life they helped save?

I think the only ethical thing to do is to decouple consumption and support. E.g. I might support some artist by buying their album (or going to their shows), because I think their voice is important, not because it's an album I listen the most to. Or I might not pay artists at all and give money to political causes or other people that need support. Or I might support them in some other way etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or a top artist having ~twice as many albums explains having ~twice as my awards as some other top artist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Lady Gaga has 35 awards? The f*** like I can sing tons of her songs.

Lady Gaga has also put out five studio albums, Taylor Swift ten.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Holy Cyberjesus... I don't experience with ChatGPT and the likes, and it's obviously only one response, but the answer I got from https://api.together.xy to "Is it okay to do intense tempo runs in winter?" is absolutely useless and wrong and neglecting the actual problems that are usually mentioned (cold air while breathing intensely):

Intense tempo runs are usually done at tempo, which means that your foot contacts the ground after a relatively long time. This is different from the typical duration of a foot contact in normal running. In normal running, the foot contacts the ground after a relatively short time. In a tempo run, the duration of your foot contact with the ground is increased, which causes you to run at a faster pace than usual.

Intense tempo runs are typically done in the winter, when the ground is harder and more difficult to run on. Hard ground can be more damaging to your body, so it's important to be careful when running on snow, ice, or concrete. It's important to take safety precautions when doing intense tempo runs in the winter, such as wearing proper shoes and clothing, and avoiding running on icy or snowy surfaces.

It's important to note that intense tempo runs can be dangerous if not done properly. It's important to have a good understanding of your body and what works best for you. It's also important to consult with a doctor before starting any new running program, especially if you have any previous injuries or health concerns.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

And no tooling will certainly improve the coding abilities. Especially since I remember all the code, including the changes others made in the time since I last looked at it.

view more: next ›