gwilikers

Thanks for the context. Soooo.... What's with he dick jokes? I mean I'm fan of dix as much as the next dick lover but setting up an emails service that's ball-to-ball dicks is a bit much.

Yeah, I thought the same. I've use mail.com to make burner emails for accounts that don't accept maildrop.cc (one off emails).

Are you saying that if NYT wants to continue to be relavent then they should agree?

Yeah, I've found myself wasting quite a lot of time thinking of the 'perfect regex' for task X only to realise that I could have avoided doing so by simply taking a different approach.

I know. I didn't say this was OOP, I said this was your brain when you OD on OOP. While we are not dealing with objects, I'd argue that the kind of approach that would lead one to needlessly overcompartmentalise code like this is the product of having a little too much OOP.

This is your brain when you OD on OOP.

I dont understand the downvotes on some of these anti-signal arguments. There are a number of very valid arguments against Signal if privacy is your chief concern: they have centralised servers, they've been extremely lax with adding their production updates to their publicly available source code on github, they receive funding from RFA.

Yeah, I would say that this applies in general. That hat that we associate with a particular kind of socially maladjusted individual is not the faithful fedora but its contemptable cousin: the thrilby.

Revanced continues to work fine for me.

Wait, what are the problems with Brave?

Am I missing something here? Did Nvidia leave a void?