gullible

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Dude, it’s accounts named “boomer opinions” or “communist git” roleplaying as racists and extermination enthusiasts. I understand your point, you just lack context and a relevant point. Had you asked rather than affirmed, you might have had both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s precisely why it can be frustrating to attempt to save someone the headache of engaging with a person speaking in bad faith, only to have the warning removed and to be told “don’t do that again, you’re being rude.” There are quite a few naturally occurring issues with social media, not least of which are trolls, and to hand wave them does little to improve the situation.

Look, all I’m saying is that if I see a streak of people writing dissertations in reply to a visibly disingenuous commenter, my warning might be worth keeping.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The difference between “notice me, I’m an attention-seeking asshole” and “notice me, my opinion is unpopular” can be difficult to discern, but becomes obvious with context. Most especially when you both point them out and provide the context. As an attention-seeking asshole, it’s a bit frustrating to be told that I can’t recognize someone doing what I do, but far less subtly.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They chose their torture… but yes, the comments they sift through are among the worst in the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s mostly in the politics communities, for all the good that information does you. It’s incredibly blatant, though that doesn’t stop folks from biting the hook given the spectrum of people here.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (27 children)

There is one complaint that I have about the mods across Lemmy, they seem to be hesitant to crack down on trolling. This has, in turn, made trolling easy thanks to the audience Lemmy attracted. Love the mods here, but when someone calls out a troll, maybe don’t remove the comment calling out the troll and leave the troll alone to continue trolling. Your contribution is actively negative if you do this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

May your sister experience an unwanted pregnancy in the Deep South, my friend.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I remember 2016 and the dialogue around the election fairly well, and this feels nostalgic. “Maybe he won’t be so bad”* is coming after trump is elected.
*Editors note: he will be

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I wonder whether Microsoft makes enough money on analytics and ads worldwide, minus Europe, to split off a separate dev team. I hope not, but I think they do… Please choose the easier, objectively better option and just make these a checkbox for everyone, windows.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Be sure to remember that, at best, AI takes prompts as interpretable guidelines and a request of “grammar checking” can involve some additional, unwarranted, restructuring. Points to whoever notices both AIisms that I noticed that chatgpt added to my grammar checked critique on grammar checking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This reminds me of an argument I saw here last week about AI and its use as a grammar checker. You can definitely do it, but you’re going to have all the markers of using AI to cheat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I never said it did, just a relevant fun fact.

view more: ‹ prev next ›