glukoza

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

i'd argue its better for software to max foss license like AGPL, not bsd that can be taken out by companies

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

They can put as much ads as they wan't they will be blocked, and there always will be a way to block them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Competition is useless, better to have federated networks and do videos for profit and find other ways to pay for content to support content creators if they need support. Block ads everywhere, work in those fields is better than calling for competition and creating competitor that will win over google and become new google.

There will be adblocker to block this also don't worry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not for UBI that much, and don't see anyone working towards global VAT. I was comparing that worry about AI that is gonna destroy humanity is not possible, it's just scifi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It replaced content writers, replacing digital artists, replacing programmers. In a sense they fire unexeprieced ones because ai speeds up those with more experience.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Fair point, but AI is part of it, I mean it exists in capitalist system. This AI Singularity apocalypse is like not gonna happen in 99%, AI within capitalism will affect us badly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

just wait until you hear about humans.txt, it really exitst here

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Ah, AI doesn't pose as danger in that way. It's danger is in replacing jobs, people getting fired bc of ai, etc.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html

Don't know who is ignorant here. Open source is bad term to be used, coopted by big tech, end of story.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I could put more thought into this meme, but it is what it is. When I get time I'll remake it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Google, Meta and Microsoft are bad. Yes they are.

But I’m good. I want to dictate who can use open-source software and how!

If I'm good or bad is not the issue here. And I'm not dicatating anything. I don't really get what you want to say ?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So I guess my question to you use, how does a corporation making money from something it shares with the public negatively impact you?

For example email,now it's very dificult to self host email and not get caught with spam filter dictated by big tech. Entire internet really, before we had personal websites, community forums then reddit came and take over the forums making profit of off it. There are many examples. It is true that this techno landscape now is mirror image of relations we have in our society, rich getting richer and exploint poorer, in most banal sense. In linux they put/or are putting in subscription system to unlock cpu cores only if you pay, even when you bought processor.

Look around more and you can find a lot of other examples, one more is EEE(embrace, extend, extinguis) of xmpp.

People seem to appreciate companies very much, even getting glad that "great meta is using activitypub with threads and we are all gonna be happy", in reality we won't. They will just co-opt fediverse and EEE it.

Me personally am on most FOSS hardvare and software I can be on this moment. If I find time to make feaseble to use more FOSS stuff and get away from all the corpos I will do that for sure. But only me, and small ammount of people going that way is not the solution. It has to be mass movement to ditch the corpos once and for all.

 
 
view more: next ›