glitchdx

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

to copy my own comment from another similar thread:

I’m an idiot with no marketable skills. I put boxes on shelves for a living. I want to be an artist, a musician, a programmer, an author. I am so bad at all of these, and between having a full time job, a significant other, and several neglected hobbies, I don’t have time to learn to get better at something I suck at. So I cheat. If I want art done, I could commission a real artist, or for the cost of one image I could pay for dalle and have as many images as I want (sure, none of them will be quite what I want but they’ll all be at least good). I could hire a programmer, or I could have chatgpt whip up a script for me since I’m already paying for it anyway since I want access to dalle for my art stuff. Since I have chatgpt anyway, I might as well use it to help flesh out my lore for the book I’ll never write. I haven’t found a good solution for music.

I have in my brain a vision for a thing that is so fucking cool (to me), and nobody else can see it. I need to get it out of my brain, and the only way to do that is to actualize it into reality. I don’t have the skills necessary to do it myself, and I don’t have the money to convince anyone else to help me do it. generative AI is the only way I’m going to be able to make this work. Sure, I wish that the creators of the content that were stolen from to train the ai’s were fairly compensated. I’d be ok with my chatgpt subscription cost going up a few dollars if that meant real living artists got paid, I’m poor but I’m not broke.

These are the opinions of an idiot with no marketable skills.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I am a cynical reader, and I appreciate your clarification.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

not just effort, I think they fuckin succeeded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I find any degree of success, then absolutely I will hire real humans to help me with my vision.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

sadly, I have a moral compass. I'm not sure where I put the damn thing, but I have one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

actually this (yes, I'm replying to myself). I'm an idiot with no marketable skills. I put boxes on shelves for a living. I want to be an artist, a musician, a programmer, an author. I am so bad at all of these, and between having a full time job, a significant other, and several neglected hobbies, I don't have time to learn to get better at something I suck at. So I cheat. If I want art done, I could commission a real artist, or for the cost of one image I could pay for dalle and have as many images as I want (sure, none of them will be quite what I want but they'll all be at least good). I could hire a programmer, or I could have chatgpt whip up a script for me since I'm already paying for it anyway since I want access to dalle for my art stuff. Since I have chatgpt anyway, I might as well use it to help flesh out my lore for the book I'll never write. I haven't found a good solution for music.

I have in my brain a vision for a thing that is so fucking cool (to me), and nobody else can see it. I need to get it out of my brain, and the only way to do that is to actualize it into reality. I don't have the skills necessary to do it myself, and I don't have the money to convince anyone else to help me do it. generative AI is the only way I'm going to be able to make this work. Sure, I wish that the creators of the content that were stolen from to train the ai's were fairly compensated. I'd be ok with my chatgpt subscription cost going up a few dollars if that meant real living artists got paid, I'm poor but I'm not broke.

These are the opinions of an idiot with no marketable skills.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

because idiots like me who have no marketable skills can use it to fool ourselves into thinking we can do code/art/literature/etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article you linked is much more detailed than the one I read, so this interaction has benefited both of us.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

luddites weren't anti technology, they were pro workers rights. they would find gpt style ai offensive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

thanks, i hate it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I've never seen wally so pissed

view more: next ›