glasgitarrewelt

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The devil's advocate forgets why the data has a value in the first place. It is used to control and manipulate to the point where elections can be won by the party that has a better understanding of advertisement and the value of the data of their costumers/voters. Thinking you are immune to manipulation because you know you are manipulated sadly doesn't work. Don't use free services if you know they act in bad faith.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am a total beginner in this regard, but maybe maybe this could help you:

Check out PBR - policy-based-routing. On OpenWRT there is an app for this task, vpn-policy-routing (together with luci-app-vpn-policy-routing for a GUI inside LuCi). This app helped me to route all traffic coming from my PiVPN to the WAN interface, instead of my commercial NordVPN. Now at home all my traffic goes to NordVPN and when I am not at home I can easily VPN into my home network.

https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/routing/pbr

Other than that, the OpenWRT Forum is very helpful, don't hesitate to ask your questions there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you, that sounds like my favorite option so far!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That summarized my situation pretty good. Since a year now I switched everything to Linux, selfhosting seems to be a natural extension of that.

May I ask, since you have a very beginner-friendly way of writing:

I run a separate NAS with an SMB share.

Why did you choose SMB instead of NFS? I read here that NFS is very efficient and fast.

Docker good

Many people here have very convincing arguments for docker. While checking it out I saw that it uses partly proprietary licenses. Why are so many people so sure that docker won't pull a 'Unity-stunt' and make their knowledge about docker obsolete?

LXC is more efficient, but it's harder to run docker in.

I meant to install a Jellyfin LXC, if there is such a thing, without docker involved. Is that possible?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There seem to be many ways to reach the same goal:

  • run Jellyfin in Docker in a VM in Proxmox
  • install Jellyfin Server in Debian in a VM in Proxmox
  • install a Jellyfin LXC container on proxmox
  • ... Probably more

I try to find the best way for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I understand that I can use a VM to run docker, but:

Wouldn't make a LXC more sense than a VM with docker inside? And what are the advantages of running jellyfin in a container instead of a normal installation? The VM is already kind of a container, what benefits do I get from yet another container inside? I am curious to learn more!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Proxmox could be the perfect learning environment for docker, just make a new VM if I borg something. I will look into it, thanks. Just not for this specific project, Jellyfin on Debian sounds good for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

The other comment made sense to me, why contain a container. But you are right, I will learn more about docker, it seems like a great tool.

Thank you for your confirmation with NFS. Just read about it yesterday, in search of an alternative to samba, what all the windows user seem to use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That makes sense, docker is off the table.

Edit: or is it? Not decided yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Thank you for your answer. I maybe want to add some features in the future, like all those *arr- programs. Wouldn't it be easier to have everything in one VM instead of many LXC?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If anyone stumbles accross this post, here is how I solved it for me:

  • PiVPN doesn't need any special firewall-treatment in OpenWRT, just use port forwarding (Source zone: WAN, Destination: LAN, with the Port you chose, 51820 is the standard for wireguard)

  • A special problem I had: I used NordVPN on OpenWRT to tunnel all my traffic through there. When I connected the PiVPN, it didn't work at first. I had to use something called PBR - Policy-Based-Routing to send all my traffic from the PiVPN to WAN. It was easy with the openWRT-app vpn-policy-routing plus luci-app-vpn-policy-routing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You are right, it is possible to set up a wireguard VPN on OpenWRT and I am planning to do that. At this point getting the Pi running is more like an exercise to get to know OpenWRT better.

view more: ‹ prev next ›