gap_betweenus

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Copyright laws protects the ability of copyright holder to make money. The laws were created before AI and now obviously have to be adapted to new technology (like you didn't really need copyright before the invention of printing). How exactly AI will be regulated is in the end up to society to decide, which most likely will come down who has the better lobby.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Rather obvious punk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's just what comes with internet becoming mainstream so mainstream cultural standards are applied to online conversations. It's the difference between an opera and a punk club or something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Photography can be art as well as AI generated images can be art as well. AI is a tool and people can create art with it. But also what is art is completely subjective to the viewer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sure, I even do photography professionally form time to time - I just don't consider it to be a painting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

With this logic photography is a painting, painted at an impossible high speed - but for some reasons we make a difference between something humans make and machines make.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Drums by the fire on shrooms was the best music epoch, after that all down hill. Stoneage gang.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Feel like here is one of a few places one can have some nice discussions, while for sure there is a general bias in opinions but people seem to at least sometimes read and answer on topic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Wtf? Just could not believe, had to check it out for myself. What's wrong with people.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago

Still here?

Doubt you will ever know what an appeal emotional logical fallacy is.

Again, we are talking about empathy and you clearly show that you don't get it. Which was my point to begin with. Sorry mate to be the one bringing you the news.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Dude, I thought you left?

Your probably claiming others would use said artwork to hurt people.

Again if you would have empathy you could just listen to people, what and how they are hurt by deepfakes and understand what the problem is. Since you don't have empathy, nothing I will tell you would make any sense for you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Not seeing how your actions are hurting others, despite them even telling you - is mostly related to lack of empathy. Not that complicated, just simple logic.

view more: next ›