furikuri

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You could try making enabling git's rerere functionality, which stands for "reuse recorded resolution"

https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rerere

https://stackoverflow.com/a/49501436

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Depends

Clannad? Valid

After-Story?

Fake CCTV image of a Labrador on its hind legs wearing boxing gloves and shorts

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Happened all the time over on r/androiddev. Small company brings on the wrong person/uses the wrong SDK/wrongfully fails an review and their account is then banned via "association", which then propagates down to countless other employees. Only way out is to hope and pray that a human sees the appeal or try and blow up online

Happened so often in fact that the subreddit even created several guides on how to avoid it. My favourite part is that even unpublished apps must be updated in perpetuity to abide by Google's ever changing requirements

Or this other occasion where viewers of one of the most popular YouTubers in the world were banned for typing in chat

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Why single out TikTok and not Chinese nationals buying US real estate, driving up the cost of commercial and residential rents?

Heavily agree that this is equally problematic, but unfortunately it seems like the choice has already been made that real estate "investments" cannot be allowed to fail. It's the same reason why they aren't also targeting US-based companies that have been shown to have ties to foreign rivals, they're literally just playing politics. Sucks, but for now this at least opens the door for further regulation in the area

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

This is why I'm having trouble understanding why people are confused about the bill's purpose, especially in the context of the last dozen years or so. Allowing a political rival to maintain control over a platform like this is granting them soft power. Even if I agree that companies like Meta should be more heavily regulated (though not in this manner), I can see why they've put a bandaid on the issue given that there's a non-zero chance that TikTok's content has been actively in the past few years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Me when I find out that it's illegal to sell your organs for profit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably doesn't help that Reddit has spent years cultivating some of the most advertiser unfriendly content available (out of the top 100 visited sites). I doubt anyone's chomping at the bit to advertise on pages like r/jailbait, r/piracy, and r/fatpeoplehate. Even if the worst of the worst have been banned the overall "culture" can't be erased as quickly

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Finally, each of us upvoted the post, [...]"

"And then we waited to see who, if anyone, would give a shit," she said.

MacFarlane concluded, "Our elegant approach didn't work, so we hired a Perl hacker to go dig up the personal details on all 38 accounts that had ever upvoted a Haskell post, and the only one we didn't know was Seth Briars.

This is the one that got me