frank

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (9 children)

The fact that me and a coworker can't both share our screens at the same time is absolutely batshit. 1x1 collaboration isn't even reasonable, nevermind anything more

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, gotcha. I knew that was II back there but I didn't recognize Brandon Toews. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's really II? I didn't realize he was non anonymous

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I opted out of this over a month ago, still opted out.

Wonder how long they've been doing this ....

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For the curious, like me

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I don't know that non-lawyers need to figure out exactly what it means, but in an ideal world: if you pay for something that includes a continuation of services and the services stop continuing, you should be compensated fairly. I am not smart enough to word that in a way that can't be worked around, "gotcha'd", etc. but I'm guessing the spirit of the rules is fairly common ground for anyone who isn't trying to rug-pull a service out from under those they sell it to.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For the first example, absolutely. If some execs have a meltdown, it could change future services but anyone who was promised Disney+ on their Tesla with no limit on it should get a fair refund. I understand that there's a slippery slope argument here, and no– the value of Disney+ in a car isn't 100% the value of it. But it's BS that a manchild having an Internet meltdown loses people a service they had and "paid for"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Also non Euclidian! Hexagons (the bestagons) also tesselate and fix that problem nicely

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Heck yeah, I'll try my best!

So on a euclidian chess board, moving your king one space left would be 1 space, one space up would be 1 space, and one space diagonally would be √2 spaces (some simple trig gets us there).

Chess however, does not obey the laws of Euclidian geometry nor does its physical representation show us things to scale. A king's move diagonally is the same amount of space as a move side to side, 1 space.

It's silly, because spaces weren't directly supposed to represent distance or anything, but it's funny that it works out this way

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Dude, same. The worst part of my recent should surgery was the lack of caffeine all day (bumped from noon to 4 pm surgery). That first sip of recovery room coffee was incredible

view more: next ›