dukk

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well, given that most sarcasm on the internet is often clearly marked with /s or some other indicator, I’m pretty sure that robots would have a tough time understanding genuine sarcasm “in the wild”.

You never know, though…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Or just use only one layer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You had a point, but then you started blaming the Americans for everything. Yeah, Americans pretty much just forget that there exist tons of people on the internet who aren’t American, but that doesn’t mean that all Americans just bring politics into everything.

Secondly, stop trying to blame others for things you have no idea who did. Sounds like you’ve got a similar problem to many Americans, where you’ll see some fair-right homophobic dude on the internet and think, “ugh, stupid Americans,”. Yeah, many Americans can be narrow-minded at times, but that doesn’t mean you project your opinion on that entire country.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With great screen estate comes great window management…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh sorry, you’re right. Amended my comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, you don’t really see many people accessing lists with pointers directly. Also 0-indexing does give us an extra number to index with(say 1-255 vs 0-255)

Edit: 0-255, not 0-256

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Especially 260.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, free as in freedom, not free as in cost. Gotcha.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t mean to be pedantic, but I think you meant Godot is open source. Yeah, I agree.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean you’re right, but I’ve never met anyone who thinks that way. C++ is everywhere (although C++ itself is just a hot mess of a language imo).

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As stated clearly in the article, the term is not “popemobile”, but rather “undignified”.

/s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I don’t know physics too well, but I’ll try to explain.

First of all, look out for pressure. Slamming your hand on a desk(lots of surface area) may not hurt much, but doing the same thing on a thumb tack(very low surface area) will suck, even though it’s the same amount of force. Pressure is just force/area (I’m probably oversimplifying).

So not only is there still 2000 pounds of force on the floor, it’s all concentrated on one(well, four) areas. Meaning that there’s a high chance the floor will break under those wheels. You’d actually have better luck just sliding the server across the floor.

Elons logic is also just stupid here. An elevator can’t lift a 1,000 pound box, but can it lift four 250 pound boxes? No! Even a child could answer that. The fact that he just assumed that adding four wheels magically distributed the weight is stupid. What if you had five wheels? Eleven? It’s not rocket science (which is quite ironic, given the company he owns).

So yeah. I’ve got no idea how he’s a billionaire. No fucking clue.

view more: ‹ prev next ›