drislands

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Against the terms of agreements they made? Yes.

To be fair, this is what I meant when I said wrong. Enough people have taken umbrage with my wording that I think I should update it, though. Thank you for your reply.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (16 children)

My understanding is that the IA had implemented a digital library, where they had (whether paid or not) some number of licenses for a selection of books. This implementation had DRM of some variety that meant you could only read the book while it was checked out. In theory, this means if the IA has 10 licenses of a book, only 10 people have a usable copy they borrowed from the IA at a time.

And then the IA disabled the DRM system, somehow, and started limitlessly lending the books they had copies of to anyone that asked.

I definitely don't like the obnoxious copyright system in the USA, but what the IA did seems obviously ~~wrong~~ against the agreement they entered into. Like if your local library got a copy of Book X and then when someone wanted to borrow it they just copied it right there and let you keep the copy.

ETA: updated my wording. I don't believe what the IA did was morally wrong, per se, but rather against the agreement I presume they entered into with the owners of the books they lent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it's actually fine. Maybe that's just semantics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do not understand what point you're making. Can you elaborate?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have had a comment of mine removed from .ml for (correctly) indicating that hexbear is not a trustworthy instance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I switched to Mint for my new PC a few months ago. There are a handful of games that don't work on it, but they're few and far between.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I'm in the same boat. There are a lot of parts of the Internet that should be free, but YouTube is not one of them. Video hosting is one of the most resource intensive services around, and if we as consumers aren't paying for it they'll find a worse way to fund it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (39 children)

A hit-piece commissioned by the Joker to distract you from his upcoming bank heist!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's trust cafe?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I can't find it now, but my company attempted to get that from Slack and IIRC it was an option but more expensive than they were willing to pay.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That is akin to amputating your leg because you're tired of stubbing your toes.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This is not remotely helpful.

 

Feels like a dumb question, but I haven't ever worn a pair of boots that didn't hurt in some way. Is this just a feature of boots, or am I doing something wrong?

 

It's been going on for months and no matter how many I mark as spam and block they keep coming back with new numbers!

Makes me wonder if someone signed me up for something

view more: next ›