drathvedro

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

EDIT: Alright, this is a terrible case because the parent element has flex and therefore no inline-flex is necessary there, but I'd argue it's the parent element being flex that is redundant, rather than child element being inline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Chromium is a superior engine, yes. But Chrome itself, at least in my eyes, looks to be the least capable browser out of the bunch. I'd rather Vivaldi if I had to switch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Huh, neat. The last time I looked, chrome was also plagued by this. Might actually re-start some projects I had, but it sucks to have to use chrome.

inline-flex is indeed necessary since we're growing left to right and flex would take the entire/fixed width, unless it's also inside a flexbox.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Sure. Here you go. The green container should cover all red boxes in both cases. I've been bashing my head against this issue for a while, but, as far as I understand, this is a bug that's never going to be fixed. Which sucks, because I wanted to re-design some of the apps in the horizontal metro-style scrolling manner for the bottom screen on my zephyrus duo, but this effectively prevents me from doing so (Unless I use grids and set positions manually).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (9 children)

It's 2024 and flexboxes still don't work that well with vertical direction and wraparound...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (13 children)

I'm appalled that classes representing visual styles are still a thing. I thought everyone already figured that it was a bad idea back in bootstrap days. But then I recently had an opportunity to work on project that uses Vuetify and saw quite long poems about flexboxes in class names...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I know a place where they still do this. They've got an 8-digit user count, 7 digit monthly profits, all running on one server that costs something like $20 a month. They've downsized a few years ago to single-digit employee number and just sit there and collect profits. And this is why I'm now working for a company that casually dropped a few grand for a glorified CPU usage meter and a few grand on top of that for deployment tool that does the same thing that the old guy at a former place was doing with his trusty FTP client.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It's probably because something your instance admins did. For me it didn't show up either, so i looked at the link:

https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fi2IzTtY.png

And it responded with 429 "Too many requests"

But the url is clearly pointing to imgur, why the middle-man? Just urldecode it and here ya go

https://i.imgur.com/i2IzTtY.png

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

This. The best you can do is encrypt your messages locally before sending. But then your email service provider still knows where you are, when and to whom you are sending the message to, and how long is it. And so does the recepient's email provider and anyone in between. Best they can do is to promise not to keep that data. But it's just that - a promise, which there is no way to verify.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I was about to say the same, but then I remembered that I'm ignoring any business that use WhatsApp or Instagram as their sole means of communication. Fuck yeah I'm a petulant teenager, it's their loss, not mine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Feels lonely, most of all. I don't fear the cops or ex-wagners I walk past every time I go to the store. It's the radio silence in once popular channels whose owners were "disappeared", and friends either in exile or too scared to even go out, that makes me feel devastated.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

I'm more of a medovukha kind of guy, but yes, indeed, we do. Thank you for saying this

view more: ‹ prev next ›