dezmd

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

No patent encumbrance. That was the entire point.

Clawing control of patent infected media standards is far more important for a healthy open internet built on open standards that is not subject to the whims and controls of capital investment groups eating up companies to exert control of the entire technology standards pipeline.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lemmy.world is a community, /c/news is a subcommunity in that context.

It is whatever we collectively decide it is with enough traction at the end of the day, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Comms and subcomms?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Look it's all actually about re-encumberancing image file formats back into corporate controlled patented formats. If we would collectively just spend time and money and development resources expanding and improving PNG and gif formats that are no longer patent encumbered, we'd all live happily ever after.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

My first real computer interaction in life was when I used the early version of ws that was a CP/M program rather than DOS (MS or IBM PC).

Frankly, I'd rather have a solid Wordperfect 5.x for DOS over Wordstar any day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Dear Sydney...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Upwork Research Institute

Not exactly a panacea of rigorous scientific study.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

11 hours of 500mbps bandwidth usage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This sounds sideways, as FOIA processing is a part of city services, and state services, and federal services.

Treating it otherwise has always seemed to invite abuse.

We also have a rule regarding conversion of electronic data from internal proprietary format to something the requestor can read that allows us to refuse if responding to the request would cause an undue disruption to city services.

How is that a legal workaround against FOIA? Literally every response to FOIA causes a 'disruption' to city services in that context. This sounds like a strategy from management that is incompetent or intentionally unethical trying to avoid processing FOIA requests. "Undue disruption" reads as a convenient scapegoat to hide things from the public, a public that the government is there to serve in the first place.

It would have taken about 6 months for a full-time employee, and our city only has 11 staffers, so we were able to tell them “no.”

~165 hours for ever 10k documents to review at 1 min avg per doc. 45k documents = 750 hours = 25 work weeks @ 30hrs.
That's $11,250 @ $15/hr wages. Call it $16,000 for FTE total costs as a govt employer. You can engage 10 local contracted temp workers to process the data in a under 3 weeks.

Once you have done the review, the dataset to that point has been compiled and can be used for other such requests without additional expenditures towards recompiling data up to that date.

I'm sure budgets are carefully crafted to avoid including FOIA processing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's strange so many comments keep experiencing it, almost like it's something else entirely, but it couldnt possibly be Candleja

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You mean gross revenue, not profit. 30% profit is after expenses including CoGS/wages and is good money if it scales.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Ironically, this was played for the Class of 98 at our Senior Prom and the lyric for the song was Class of 97, the version from the album before they re-released it for that money grab with Class of 99.

The song was just a retelling of the original ‘Wear Sunscreen’ written by Mary Schmich, a columnist for the Chicago Tribune in 1997.

view more: ‹ prev next ›